This year must be a watershed in the fight against poverty. In order to "make poverty history," both France and the UK are pushing bold new ideas. But to appreciate them, one needs to understand the terms of the current debate.
Five years ago, the UN general assembly adopted a set of targets for poverty reduction and human development to be achieved by 2015, the so-called Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). But with the resources available, they are beyond reach, especially in sub-Saharan Africa.
The need for a radical increase in aid to poor countries is beyond dispute. Nor is there much dispute about the amount required -- US$50 billion a year in additional aid would be enough to meet the goals in 2015, a paltry sum compared with a global gross national product of US$40 trillion.
Today, the debate is about where the money should come from. On this, both France and the UK are eager to innovate.
First, developed countries should aim at devoting 0.7 percent of their GDP to Official Development Assistance. France has set itself this target for 2012. The UK is in a position to reach it by the same date. But we need to do more.
Development cannot wait, and needs have to be satisfied now. The sooner aid comes to recipient countries, the more effective it will be. Aid also has to be more stable and predictable. "Stop and go" policies hamper development.
So new means are needed for finance development, with France and the UK at the forefront of this search. The UK has proposed creating an International Finance Facility (IFF). This is a bold new idea which would permit an immediate increase in the financial transfers to poor countries, thus stabilizing human development programs in the long term.
Our two countries, together with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, are working on a pilot IFF scheme to promote vaccine immunization in poor countries.
France has, for some time, strongly advocated the creation of global taxes to finance the fight against poverty. This would not require the creation of any new international bureaucracy, and would be based on voluntary cooperation between sovereign states. Its main advantage would be to secure stable, immediately available financing for the MDGs.
Last year, in a joint endeavor between emerging and developed countries, Brazil, Chile, France and Spain looked at several options for global taxes. The report they co-authored concluded in favor of the economic feasibility of international taxes.
Building on this emerging consensus, French President Jacques Chirac, in his Davos speech in January, suggested a very small levy (about one ten-thousandth) on international financial transactions and some taxes on air transport.
Admittedly, international taxation is controversial. However, the public outpouring of generosity throughout the world following the Asian tsunami points to a shift in world opinion. A contribution of ?1 (US$1.91) or ?2 on every plane ticket in the world would produce almost enough revenue to finance the worldwide fight against AIDS.
Who could refuse such an effort? Who could refuse to stem the "silent tsunamis" which happen every day in Africa? As Chirac said, "The disproportion between the modest efforts needed and the benefits everyone would reap from them is striking."
The proposals made by France and the UK, while different, are complementary and reinforce each other. The IFF would ensure that government aid money would be made available sooner. The French proposals would contribute to the same goal while avoiding increasing the developing countries' debt.
Chirac has pledged his full support for the British proposals. Both Prime Minister Tony Blair and German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder have welcomed the French proposals.
Aid is not, of course, the only component of a development strategy. Debt relief, to which we remain fully committed, is also essential. We recognize that, ultimately, greater integration of poor countries in world trade through better access to our markets is an essential driver of growth and poverty reduction.
But aid is indispensable. We are one-third of the way to the target date for the achievement of the MDGs. Decisions made this year will determine the shape of the aid development system for the years to come. Now is the moment to act.
We are fortunate that the UK holds the chair of the G8 during this crucial period. It got off to a good start at the G7 meeting of finance ministers in London: With the backing of his European partners, UK Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown succeeded in putting development at the top of the agenda. It is our common duty to see that it stays there.
Gerard Errera is the French ambassador to the UK.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused