After the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and People First Party repeatedly claimed that an inappropriate voting process might cause a riot, the Central Election Commission decided to adjust the March 20 voting process. The commission adopted this measure to help the presidential election go smoothly. But the pan-blue camp was as pleased with itself as if it had just won a battle. Its political tactics, which damaged democracy, were deplorable.
I questioned the blue-camp's ill-intended words and deeds last year. Unexpectedly, those people still stubbornly made the "riot" claims at the last moment before the election. Not only have they caused social unease, but they have also caused irreparable harm to themselves.
Neither the future of Taiwan nor that of society is their concern. So those people have recklessly damaged both. In the past, those of the old power structure and the remnants of the Chiang dynasty were the dictators' followers. Later, during former president Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) 12-year presidency, Lee strongly promoted these people in order to give them a chance to reform themselves. But they only put on masks for a while, waiting for an opportunity to subvert things, believing that they would no longer be associated with "black gold," and could become democratic activists after losing power.
They have ignored the relatively mature political thinking of the Taiwanese people through the nation's two direct presidential elections, and the forming national awareness in society.
Due to the pan-blue camp's ignorant and arrogant attitude, a lot of voters have walked away from the alliance. The pan-blue camp believes that it will win the election as Lien and Soong's supporters combine, so they never seriously think about any policies for the good of the country and its people, and can only follow the direction of the rival camp.
They have disappointed many middle-class voters.
Since they always exchanged votes for resources in the past, voters in remote areas have awakened and will not be fooled, having lost their resources.
As for moderate voters who are crucial to this election, they have all been scared away by the blue camp's riot claim.
The riot claim displays a clear signal and suggests a hypothesis. The signal is that the blue camp is not confident in itself and its momentum is about to collapse. The hypothesis is that if the pan-blue camp is hopeless about winning the election, it may become reckless in its desperation and create an uproar so as to take over a government in chaos.
Or at least, if a post-election riot occurs, it can claim that the election results are invalid.
The signal is extremely obvious; the hypothesis is worrisome.
Some of these people [besieged the presidential residence] after the 2000 presidential election. Considerable numbers of Chinese forces have hidden in Taiwan and this "fifth column" would definitely be launched in certain circumstances. China would not need to fire ballistic missiles at all and the US would hardly be able to get involved. Thus, if Taiwan were unable to promptly stop all this by itself, President Chen Shui-bian's (
Nevertheless, these people's evil tricks will never work. Since middle-of-the-road voters have "middle-class vested interests," their interests will be threatened if a riot occurs. To protect their own interests, they will lean toward the power that maintains stability. They will drastically broaden the gap between the two camps, so that they will have no excuse for a riot.
This will also bury people who advocate for a riot, terminating their political careers forever.
Chiu Kuo-chen is a political commentator.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the