China's aversion to risk
The US' position on Taiwanese independence and the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) staunch support for the status quo is fatally shortsighted. They are focusing solely on preserving the status quo without questioning whether it is desirable and sustainable.
The sole rationale for maintaining the present ambiguity over the non-independence of Taiwan is that this stance might increase the chances of Taiwan's survival. (This assumes that the US and the KMT would, if China were not present, prefer that Taiwan exist as a sovereign state.)
However, there is only one scenario where the status quo would preserve Taiwan's sovereignty: if China undergoes a peaceful democratic revolution. Unfortunately, that possibility is not very likely. The continued modernization of the Chinese military increasingly weights the strategic calculus in China's favour. Eventually, even the most conservative and risk-averse of the Chinese leadership will find it difficult to pass up the opportunity Taiwan presents to fuel the flame of Chinese nationalism.
It is this conservatism that is Taiwan's biggest ally. The current Chinese leadership is unlikely to risk war with the US; however, this posture is changing as the leadership becomes younger and more aggressive.
Regardless of the US' wishes to avoid confrontation with China, some sort of escalation is inevitable in the future as China flexes its political, military and economic muscle.
Under these conditions, it is clear that Taiwan has only one option. If events are heading toward a confrontation despite the maintenance of the status quo, it is time for Taiwan to reject it now while the Chinese leadership is risk-averse and while the US is belligerent.
Clarification of Taiwan's status is overdue. Addressing the issue now will force the US to support Taiwan in any confrontation with China or support the invasion of a democratic and sovereign state by an autocratic one.
This is a calculated risk, but it is preferable to certain military annexation or economic absorption at a time of China's choosing and on its terms. In short, it is time for Taiwan to call China's bluff.
No debate necessary
I do not see any reason to debate whether Taiwan should be governed by Beijing. The people of the world need to reflect each day on the cruel and insane practices of China.
Does anyone want a country where religion is oppressed by torture? China has destroyed Buddhist monasteries and killed more than 1 million Tibetans.
China is not working for peace and a nuclear-free world when it comes to North Korea. The leaders of China enjoy the nuclear crisis with North Korea because it makes China appear more important.
If the nuclear issue is resolved, then the leaders in Beijing will lose some of their authority.
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a
There have been media reports that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) plans to hold military exercises in August to simulate seizing the Pratas Islands (Dongsha Islands, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea. In the past, only Coast Guard Administration (CGA) personnel have been stationed there, but the Ministry of National Defense has dispatched the Republic of China Marine Corps to the islands, nominally for “ex-situ training,” to prevent a Chinese attack under the guise of military drills. The move is only a temporary measure and not sufficiently proactive. Instead, the government should officially declare sovereignty over the islands and station troops
In March 2011, then-US president Barack Obama’s director of national intelligence, James Clapper, told the US Senate Intelligence Committee that, considering both its capabilities and intent, communist China presented “the greatest mortal threat” to the US, followed by Russia. In the ensuing years, in the face of faltering US responses, China expanded and intensified its hostile actions against US interests and values. Consistent with US President Donald Trump’s call for a dramatic new approach, within months of taking office, his administration’s National Security Strategy said of China’s multidimensional assault: “China is using economic inducements and penalties, influence operations ... implied military