In the history of civilization, war could be said to top the list of mankind's cruelest and ugliest creations. In the past, the perpetrators of all the various atrocities men commit against one another in the course of fighting and warfare could only be condemned in writings. There was no way to impose real sanctions on them, and for this reason the world could only stand by helplessly and watch while ambition-ridden megalomaniacs repeatedly trampled on human rights.
After World War II, when the US took the lead in guiding post-war reconstruction of the world order, it perceived the fearsome and destructive nature of war. Thus, when plans were being laid for the UN, it was clearly stipulated in the UN Charter that any warlike actions not approved by the UN and undertaken for the sake of preserving peace are illegal. In the half century after World War II, however, the world still experienced many incidents of war, aggression and genocide because there existed no organization or judicial institution able to restrain the individuals responsible for these crimes or accept appeals from victims.
In July 1998, however, when the Rome Conference was convened, the situation changed completely. No longer was it impossible to go after those who commit war crimes or genocide. At the conference, the countries in attendance voted unanimously to pass a resolution (known as the "Rome Statute") establishing a permanent International Criminal Court (ICC) responsible for trying people accused of genocide, crimes against humanity, crimes of aggression and so on. By July last year, this statute designed to protect human rights had already been signed and approved by over 60 countries. The ICC was formally established and ready to begin operations.
The ICC is a permanent, independent judicial institution under the guidance of the UN. Its establishment could be called a milestone in mankind's march toward realizing the rights to peace, security and the rule of law. Its function is to indict and punish those guilty of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes of aggression. Moreover, its jurisdiction is not limited to affairs between countries.
The ICC has the right to investigate, indict and try anyone guilty of one of the four crimes listed above. The difference between the ICC and the International Court of Justice under the auspices of the UN is that the ICC is only responsible for investigating individual criminal culpability and it exercises jurisdiction only if the courts of any given country are unable to try a case on their own.
Furthermore, apart from countries applying to the court to open an investigation, the court's prosecutors may also carry out an investigation on their own initiative based on their knowledge of criminal activity. In addition, the court's jurisdiction is not limited to nations that are signatories of the Rome Statute. Even if the nation where criminal activity takes place or the accused has citizenship is not a signatory, the court can still exercise its powers. And it is precisely because it has these special characteristics that the ICC can act as a deterrent to individuals who would arbitrarily violate the human rights of others.
As a member of the international community, Taiwan has been relentlessly oppressed by China in international forums of all sorts and has been kicked out of numerous international organizations. Nevertheless, Taiwan still scrupulously abides by its responsibilities and duties as a member of the international community and does its utmost to respect and comply with many international treaties.
Taiwan has not disregarded international treaties just because it is not a signatory nation. While Taiwan continues to apply for membership in many international organizations, we should also note that becoming a signatory of the ICC represents a goal we can strive to attain. Since China, which has always had a poor human-rights record, has not yet signed and is even afraid to become a signatory nation of the ICC, it has no basis for trying to suppress Taiwan's application.
In the face of China's missile threat and other military threats, Taiwan must seek self-protection. Joining the signatories of the ICC would be a form of "alternative" self-defense. If China were to invade Taiwan, it would be engaging in criminal behavior prohibited by the ICC, and China's leaders would be considered war criminals and face investigation and indictment.
For this reason, China's schemes to attack Taiwan militarily could be deterred. Becoming a signatory of the ICC could help international society better understand Taiwan's commitment to human rights and at the same time provide real safeguards to our national security. Taiwan should actively campaign to be a part of the ICC and stand together with mainstream views around the world by striving to defend human rights.
Chien Hsi-chieh is the executive director of the Peacetime Foundation of Taiwan.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS