The recent push given by US President George W. Bush to the so-called Middle East "road map" is welcome, and the fact that both Israel and the Palestinians have accepted it is a good omen. Yet the chances that it will bring real, as opposed to merely rhetorical, progress toward reconciliation remain slim.
The reasons are manifold: First, what is called a "road map" is in reality little more than a wish list of what has to be done in order to achieve peace between Israel and the Palestinians. It is a noble set of goals, but it sometimes appears to be distant from the region's political realities.
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
For example, the road map rightly acknowledges that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict cannot be solved in a void; regional considerations must be taken into account. The plan calls for far-reaching Israeli concessions: withdrawal from the West Bank and Gaza, dismantling of settlements, some compromise about Jerusalem.
At the same time, the "quartet" that composed the road map -- the US, the EU, Russia, and the UN -- realizes that Israel cannot be convinced to make such concessions without a fundamental change in the general attitude of the Arab world to the existence of the Jewish state. Despite peace with Egypt and Jordan, Israel remains threatened by such countries as Syria and Libya, whose extremist regimes are deeply involved in violent terrorism against civilians in Israel and either possess or try to possess weapons of mass destruction.
For this reason, the road map premises peace between Israel and the Palestinians on normalization of relations between Israel and all Arab countries. Can this really be achieved in the foreseeable future?
Does the US -- or, for that matter the Quartet -- really believe they know how to move Syria or Libya from their current closed-mind position, which threatens Israel's existence? There is no indication in the road map that the initiators have thought this out beyond wishing out loud that it would happen.
Similarly, the road map is an attempt to revive the Oslo peace process. But this process, based in the 1993 Oslo accords between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), has been in serious trouble since Palestinian President Yasser Arafat rejected the peace package offered to him by then prime minister Ehud Barak, with the support of then president Bill Clinton, at Camp David in December 2000.
This was a watershed in Middle East politics -- a massive change for the worse. The Palestinians' refusal to accept -- or even continue to negotiate about -- the most generous and comprehensive Israeli offer since l967 in exchange for an end-of-conflict agreement signified that the Palestinians are not ready to accept Israel's legitimacy.
There is now much more bitterness, fear, and hatred on both sides than in 2000, when the Camp David negotiations failed. The direct and indirect support given by the Palestinian Authority to suicide bombing against civilians in Israel suggested to most Israelis that the Palestinians still view attacks against civilians as a legitimate weapon. The sometimes-brutal Israeli responses to such terrorism further embittered the Palestinians against Israel.
True, the sidelining of Arafat and the appointment of Abu Mazen as the Palestinian prime minister is an important step in the right direction. But Abu Mazen's real power has yet to be tested. Does he really control the murky financial resources of the PLO, which gave Arafat so much real power beyond the formal title of head of the Palestinian Authority?
Most importantly, does Abu Mazen have the political will and power to really suppress -- harshly, if necessary -- the murderous terrorist gangs that control so much of the Palestinian population? Much depends on the answers to these questions.
Last but not least: By the admission of its drafters, the road map will take a number of years to implement -- in the best case two, in the worst case three or four. It would need constant follow-up on dozens of contentious points at the highest level, ie, the American president.
Is Bush -- or any US president -- capable of effectively exercising his enormous authority, day in and day out for two or three years, to ensure that the parties really translate what might be just a verbal acceptance of vague language into painful, and even politically dangerous, decisions?
Past experience is not encouraging. The attention span of an American president is limited on any issue. Yet without his constant attention, the road map will run into the Middle East sand dunes that have already buried so many well-intentioned peace plans.
What, then, can be achieved? Perhaps, as in Bosnia and Kosovo -- where nobody talks about a permanent solution, but violence has been stopped -- ? what is needed is stabilization, an end to daily bloodshed, de-escalation of hostility, and some mutual confidence building.
Israelis and Palestinians are not yet ready for the tough political decisions envisaged by the road map.
They need a series of stopgap measures to bring stability and safety for civilians on both sides.
With such de-escalation, perhaps at some time in the future true reconciliation will be possible. However difficult or sad to admit, the moment is not ripe for more than this.
Shlomo Avineri is professor of political science at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused