Misguided puff piece
I read with dismay the review by David Frazier in the Around Town section of the Chao Li restaurant in Nanwan ("Restaurants," March 28, page 19). Frazier seemed oblivious or insensitive to the fact that this restaurant serves up the increasingly scarce puffer fish and parrot fish that have been caught within the boundaries of the Kenting Marine Park.
He also boldly announced that the owner of the restaurant encourages local scuba divers to poach fish from the park and then purchases them.
As a scuba diver with more than 600 dives within the Kenting Marine Park, I have observed over the past 14 years the steady decline of every species of fish living in this area.
It is a sad fact that the puffer fish, once a common sight in the park, are nowadays quite rare. One reason is that these gentle, slow moving fish are an easy target for predatory divers who enjoy the "sport" of killing fish for a cheap meal or an even cheaper thrill. Or perhaps they turn the dried skin of the dead fish into a ghoulish souvenir to hang from their ceiling.
The other even greater danger to this and other endangered local species, once abundant, such as the Moray eel and the parrot fish, is the type of restaurant so thoughtlessly reviewed by Frazier. How much longer is it going to be before the tourists and the local people in the Kenting area wake up to the fact that the marine resources in Kenting are finite and in desperate need of protection?
The once beautiful coral gardens of Kenting and the fish that inhabit them should be regarded as a national treasure and protected.
With protection, Kenting and its marine park could become a mecca for divers and snorkelers in the region and provide good business for the local people.
Unfortunately, if the present spate of uncontrolled fishing, poaching and pollution of the park's resources is allowed to continue, the next decade will see not only the passing of the puffer and parrot fish but possibly those of many other indigenous species of coral and fish, and with it the local dive industry.
Perhaps the only good thing to come out of this sorry situation will be the demise of restaurants serving, as your writer put it, "dishes truly local to the Hengchun peninsula." Will the Chao Li restaurant eventually serve up the last puffer or parrot fish to be caught in Kenting?
For a supposedly pro-environment newspaper like yours, your shortsightedness in frequently publishing glowing reviews or advertisements for restaurants that serve up endangered species such as shark and, most recently, that gentle giant, the sunfish, is not only in my opinion ignorant but also sets an extremely bad example.
Restaurants such as Chao Li ought to be boycotted, not advertised and encouraged by reviews in your or any other newspaper.
Andrew Gray
Kaohsiung
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
On the eve of the 80th anniversary of Victory in Europe (VE) Day, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) made a statement that provoked unprecedented repudiations among the European diplomats in Taipei. Chu said during a KMT Central Standing Committee meeting that what President William Lai (賴清德) has been doing to the opposition is equivalent to what Adolf Hitler did in Nazi Germany, referencing ongoing investigations into the KMT’s alleged forgery of signatures used in recall petitions against Democratic Progressive Party legislators. In response, the German Institute Taipei posted a statement to express its “deep disappointment and concern”