President Chen Shui-bian (
His article made the point that in the Korean War of the 1950s, China's military aid to Pyongyang prevented the US from defeating North Korea. China continued to provide aid after the war. Beijing therefore cannot "feign irrelevance." Indeed, China shed the blood of several hundred thousand soldiers of the "Chinese People's Volunteer Army" to prop up Kim Il-song's terrorist gang. It was called "a friendship sealed in blood" and the Volunteer Soldiers were called "the most lovable people." Later, China continued to provide large-scale economic assistance to prop up Kim's terrorist regime and allow him to bequeath it to his son, Kim Jong-il.
Before Kim Jong-il succeeded his father, he already had a hand in North Korea's terrorist activities. In the 1983 Rangoon bombing incident, four South Korean government ministers on a state visit to Burma were assassinated. former South Korean President Chun Doo-hwan would have died as well if he hadn't been running a little late that day. In 1987, the North Korean agent Kim Hyun-hee bombed a South Korean passenger aircraft, killing 115 people. In 1978 the well-known South Korean film director Shin Sang-ok and his actress wife Choi En-hui were kidnapped in Macau and taken to North Korea. Apart from these incidents, Pyongyang has been involved in everything from smuggling and selling drugs to printing counterfeit money. With this kind of behavior directed at the outside world, one can only imagine how the terrorist regime behaves toward its own people.
North Korea signed the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty in 1985, but refused to allow inspection of its nuclear facilities. In 1990, the US said North Korea was very close to producing nuclear weapons. In 1994, Pyongyang signed the 1994 Framework Agreement and promised to freeze its nuclear program in exchange for international aid in the construction of two nuclear reactors used for power generation. But Pyongyang did not adhere to the agreement, and has admitted that it has continued to develop nuclear weapons all along.
After the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, US President George W. Bush named three countries an "axis of evil," and one of them was North Korea. While the US is busy preparing for war with Iraq, Pyongyang has seized the opportunity to reactivate its nuclear reactors. It has also decided to expel UN nuclear inspectors, prompting US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to issue a warning saying that the US is capable of fighting wars on two fronts.
North Korea's intransigence is inextricably linked to the support it receives from China, without which the Pyongyang regime could not have survived the famine of recent years. That was why North Korean leader Kim Jong-il was silent when China arrested business tycoon Yang Bin (楊斌) after he was appointed governor of North Korea's Sinuiju Special Administrative Region. Kim was silent because of the 80 billion yuan in Chinese aid that props up the Kim dynasty. Beijing could stop Kim from playing with fire if it had the same kind of will to do so as it displayed in the case of Yang. The problem is that Beijing has always used North Korea as a bargaining chip with the US.
But by advocating a nuclear-free Korean peninsula, Beijing appears to be pressuring Pyongyang. Primarily, however, China wants to use Pyongyang's anti-US stance to highlight the importance of its own influence. Pyongyang also understands that China is not sincere toward the US. China may even have struck a tacit agreement with Pyongyang to work together to get up to mischief against the US. Otherwise, one suspects, North Korea would not have been so audacious.
During their meeting in October, Bush asked Chinese President Jiang Zemin (江澤民) whether Kim was a "peaceful man." Jiang's response was, "To be honest, I don't know." How could he not know, given the close ties between the two communist parties and regimes, and given China's understanding of North Korea's policies? It is absolutely necessary now for the US Congress to order the US-China Security Review Commission to investigate whether Beijing has sold nuclear materials to North Korea. The US should investigate whether China is truly opposed to terrorism. The US should look into China's attitude toward rogue states in the Middle East and, more importantly, toward North Korea. Let's see if Beijing is prepared to sacrifice one of its own for a righteous cause by taking a stand between the US and North Korea.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
Translated by Ethan Harkness and Francis huang
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS