On Nov. 26 the US made a bold proposal, in the context of ongoing negotiations in the WTO, to eliminate all tariffs on manufactured products by 2015. We will begin to formally discuss this proposal with our trading partners at the WTO this month. In offering this proposal, our goal is to stimulate economic growth, raise incomes and lower taxes, generate jobs, reduce poverty and cut costs for consumers and businesses around the world. This fits in well with the similarly ambitious US proposals for market access liberalization in the agriculture and services sectors.
In fact, the US goal for all trade in goods is the same -- complete elimination of tariffs. These three areas of the Doha Agenda are the core of market access. This would result in nearly US$6 trillion in world trade becoming duty free. The World Bank estimates that removing all barriers to goods trade would expand the global economy by US$830 billion by 2015. This represents a 2.5 percent annual increase in world per capita income, about US$136 dollars for every person in the world.
Increasingly, WTO members are coming to accept that the path to economic development and the liberation from poverty lies not in continued protectionist trade policies, but rather in multilateral trade liberalization.
Taiwan could be one of the major beneficiaries of the US proposal to eliminate all tariffs on manufactured products. Given Taiwan's trade-driven economic growth and the importance of the manufacturing sector in this equation, any move by its important trading partners to lower tariffs naturally would benefit Taiwan.
Furthermore, as a new member of the WTO, Taiwan's support for the proposal would place it at the forefront of the growing international consensus to promote trade liberalization. The US proposal will provide considerable benefits for the world's poor. Let's touch on some evidence that illustrates this point.
Developing-country tariffs hurt other developing countries the most. Nearly half of all developing-country trade is with other developing countries and about 70 percent of the tariffs paid by developing countries are paid to other developing countries. Those tariffs are on the whole quite high. As the WTO recently reported, high tariffs impart an anti-export bias, hampering a country's ability to grow through exports.
The World Bank estimates that developing countries could realize income gains of more than US$500 billion from duty free trade. Three-fourths of that gain would come from eliminating tariffs on trade between developing countries themselves. Also according to the World Bank, duty-free trade in goods and services -- coupled with other steps to enhance development -- could lift 300 million people out of poverty by 2015. That is certainly a goal well worth pursuing. And it's important to note that the US proposal gives developing countries what they have always wanted: duty-free access to markets in North America, Europe, Japan as well as to other developing country markets for the products they export.
This raises another important point. We are not asking developing countries to throw open their doors immediately. And we are not asking them to act without help from us. The fact is that our proposal first provides for WTO members to achieve an overall balance in tariff rates, and only then to move together toward tariff elimination.
Along the way, the US and other developed countries are committed to providing technical assistance to developing countries, so that they can fully participate in and benefit from the new negotiations under the Doha Development Agenda. Because we are sure that liberalization will ultimately benefit all, we are willing to ensure that all members are in a position to benefit from liberalization. The US views this proposal as a critical part of a larger "competitive liberalization" strategy, fitting in with the current US bilateral and regional free-trade negotiations.
The reality is we will seek progress where it can be made, with countries that are prepared to negotiate. About half of global goods trade is already duty-free under more than 200 regional or bilateral free-trade agreements.
However, we would like to see that progress takes place primarily in the WTO, where trade liberalization can benefit all members. This proposal is simply asking the WTO to set the world standard for genuinely global duty-free trade. But we and others are not going to sacrifice our own economic future if the WTO proves too slow.
The message here is simple. Countries run an increasing risk of being sidelined if they prove unwilling to work with other WTO members toward liberalization.
This proposal contributes to fulfilling our commitment to the American people to grow the economy, and to fulfilling a moral responsibility to reduce poverty and stimulate economic opportunities around the world. We encourage our WTO partners to work with us to create a more prosperous future for all.
Douglas Paal is the director of the American Institute in Taiwan.
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
On April 11, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivered a speech at a joint meeting of the US Congress in Washington, in which he said that “China’s current external stance and military actions present an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge … to the peace and stability of the international community.” Kishida emphasized Japan’s role as “the US’ closest ally.” “The international order that the US worked for generations to build is facing new challenges,” Kishida said. “I understand it is a heavy burden to carry such hopes on your shoulders,” he said. “Japan is already standing shoulder to shoulder
Former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) used to push for reforms to protect Taiwan by adopting the “three noes” policy as well as “Taiwanization.” Later, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) wished to save the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) by pushing for the party’s “localization,” hoping to compete with homegrown political parties as a pro-Taiwan KMT. However, the present-day members of the KMT do not know what they are talking about, and do not heed the two former presidents’ words, so the party has suffered a third consecutive defeat in the January presidential election. Soon after gaining power with the help of the KMT’s