Following the further opening of Taiwanese investment and trade with China last August, investments have been pouring into China. The government is unable to stem the steady increase in capital flowing into China, at best succeeding only in slowing the rate of increase. By now, over 50,000 Taiwanese businesses have invested over US$100 billion in China. Investments have expanded from traditional to high-tech industries and the trend shows investments growing in size.
A typical example of this is the investments by Wang Yung-ching (
Recently, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) and United Microelectronics Corp (UMC, 聯電) have been very active. TSMC chairman Morris Chang (張忠謀) has been criticising the years of restraint under the "no haste, be patient" policy, while UMC has back-pedalled on plans for a large wafer foundry in Tainan. Instead it is planning a plant in the Suzhou Industrial Park in Jiangsu Province. It also is planning to build a 12-inch wafer plant in Singapore with US-based Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD).
Taiwanese high-tech companies are busy positioning themselves in China. Even though they say that this is only one link in their overall global positioning, investments in Taiwan have not increased accordingly -- rather, they have fallen. A further hollowing out of Taiwanese industry seems inevitable.
In a speech on Jan. 31, US Trade Representative Robert Zoellick predicted that China will become the world's largest producer of IT hardware within the next decade and challenge Tai-wan's position as the center for semiconductor manufacturing.
Judging from the competition between Taiwanese semiconductor manufacturers investing in China, however, Taiwan will be surpassed by China within five years -- after the government allows eight-inch wafer manu-facturers to move to China -- if authorities cannot implement an effective system of controls. If Taiwan does not develop more advantageous and more competitive industries, we will suffer an even deeper economic crisis and face even higher unemployment.
The development of TSMC, UMC and other high-tech busi-nesses have all been encouraged by the government through the Industrial Technology Research Institute (工業技術研究院) and industrial parks, which have invested tens of billions of New Taiwan dollars. TSMC and UMC are the two most competitive Taiwanese wafer manufacturers in the global market. Now they are competing to get out of the country.
So what is the problem? Since the government's substitution of the "no haste, be patient" policy by the "active opening and effective management" policy last November, overseas investment and capital outflow pressures have increased by the day. Even though the government is fighting "black gold" politics and improving public security and the financial situation, the problem with companies investing in China is that they leave debt and unemployment in Taiwan.
So where does the problem lie? Has the investment environment in Taiwan really deteriorated so far? Are there really no investment opportunities in Taiwan? Is China really a money-making paradise?
The greatest challenge for the new Cabinet and its focus on the economy will be to increase administrative efficiency, im-prove the investment environment and formulate a set of regulations for the effective management of investments in China.
Wang To-far is a professor of economics at National Taipei University.
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
Media said that several pan-blue figures — among them former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), former KMT legislator Lee De-wei (李德維), former KMT Central Committee member Vincent Hsu (徐正文), New Party Chairman Wu Cheng-tien (吳成典), former New Party legislator Chou chuan (周荃) and New Party Deputy Secretary-General You Chih-pin (游智彬) — yesterday attended the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) military parade commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. China’s Xinhua news agency reported that foreign leaders were present alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers. The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators. The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had