Following the further opening of Taiwanese investment and trade with China last August, investments have been pouring into China. The government is unable to stem the steady increase in capital flowing into China, at best succeeding only in slowing the rate of increase. By now, over 50,000 Taiwanese businesses have invested over US$100 billion in China. Investments have expanded from traditional to high-tech industries and the trend shows investments growing in size.
A typical example of this is the investments by Wang Yung-ching (
Recently, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) and United Microelectronics Corp (UMC, 聯電) have been very active. TSMC chairman Morris Chang (張忠謀) has been criticising the years of restraint under the "no haste, be patient" policy, while UMC has back-pedalled on plans for a large wafer foundry in Tainan. Instead it is planning a plant in the Suzhou Industrial Park in Jiangsu Province. It also is planning to build a 12-inch wafer plant in Singapore with US-based Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD).
Taiwanese high-tech companies are busy positioning themselves in China. Even though they say that this is only one link in their overall global positioning, investments in Taiwan have not increased accordingly -- rather, they have fallen. A further hollowing out of Taiwanese industry seems inevitable.
In a speech on Jan. 31, US Trade Representative Robert Zoellick predicted that China will become the world's largest producer of IT hardware within the next decade and challenge Tai-wan's position as the center for semiconductor manufacturing.
Judging from the competition between Taiwanese semiconductor manufacturers investing in China, however, Taiwan will be surpassed by China within five years -- after the government allows eight-inch wafer manu-facturers to move to China -- if authorities cannot implement an effective system of controls. If Taiwan does not develop more advantageous and more competitive industries, we will suffer an even deeper economic crisis and face even higher unemployment.
The development of TSMC, UMC and other high-tech busi-nesses have all been encouraged by the government through the Industrial Technology Research Institute (工業技術研究院) and industrial parks, which have invested tens of billions of New Taiwan dollars. TSMC and UMC are the two most competitive Taiwanese wafer manufacturers in the global market. Now they are competing to get out of the country.
So what is the problem? Since the government's substitution of the "no haste, be patient" policy by the "active opening and effective management" policy last November, overseas investment and capital outflow pressures have increased by the day. Even though the government is fighting "black gold" politics and improving public security and the financial situation, the problem with companies investing in China is that they leave debt and unemployment in Taiwan.
So where does the problem lie? Has the investment environment in Taiwan really deteriorated so far? Are there really no investment opportunities in Taiwan? Is China really a money-making paradise?
The greatest challenge for the new Cabinet and its focus on the economy will be to increase administrative efficiency, im-prove the investment environment and formulate a set of regulations for the effective management of investments in China.
Wang To-far is a professor of economics at National Taipei University.
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS