Following the further opening of Taiwanese investment and trade with China last August, investments have been pouring into China. The government is unable to stem the steady increase in capital flowing into China, at best succeeding only in slowing the rate of increase. By now, over 50,000 Taiwanese businesses have invested over US$100 billion in China. Investments have expanded from traditional to high-tech industries and the trend shows investments growing in size.
A typical example of this is the investments by Wang Yung-ching (
Recently, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) and United Microelectronics Corp (UMC, 聯電) have been very active. TSMC chairman Morris Chang (張忠謀) has been criticising the years of restraint under the "no haste, be patient" policy, while UMC has back-pedalled on plans for a large wafer foundry in Tainan. Instead it is planning a plant in the Suzhou Industrial Park in Jiangsu Province. It also is planning to build a 12-inch wafer plant in Singapore with US-based Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD).
Taiwanese high-tech companies are busy positioning themselves in China. Even though they say that this is only one link in their overall global positioning, investments in Taiwan have not increased accordingly -- rather, they have fallen. A further hollowing out of Taiwanese industry seems inevitable.
In a speech on Jan. 31, US Trade Representative Robert Zoellick predicted that China will become the world's largest producer of IT hardware within the next decade and challenge Tai-wan's position as the center for semiconductor manufacturing.
Judging from the competition between Taiwanese semiconductor manufacturers investing in China, however, Taiwan will be surpassed by China within five years -- after the government allows eight-inch wafer manu-facturers to move to China -- if authorities cannot implement an effective system of controls. If Taiwan does not develop more advantageous and more competitive industries, we will suffer an even deeper economic crisis and face even higher unemployment.
The development of TSMC, UMC and other high-tech busi-nesses have all been encouraged by the government through the Industrial Technology Research Institute (工業技術研究院) and industrial parks, which have invested tens of billions of New Taiwan dollars. TSMC and UMC are the two most competitive Taiwanese wafer manufacturers in the global market. Now they are competing to get out of the country.
So what is the problem? Since the government's substitution of the "no haste, be patient" policy by the "active opening and effective management" policy last November, overseas investment and capital outflow pressures have increased by the day. Even though the government is fighting "black gold" politics and improving public security and the financial situation, the problem with companies investing in China is that they leave debt and unemployment in Taiwan.
So where does the problem lie? Has the investment environment in Taiwan really deteriorated so far? Are there really no investment opportunities in Taiwan? Is China really a money-making paradise?
The greatest challenge for the new Cabinet and its focus on the economy will be to increase administrative efficiency, im-prove the investment environment and formulate a set of regulations for the effective management of investments in China.
Wang To-far is a professor of economics at National Taipei University.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
RSS