Taiwan is suffering its worst ever economic recession in 26 years. Its economy shrank 4.21 percent in the third quarter of this year compared with last year. Unemployment swelled to 5.36 percent in October. While the November unemployment rate experienced its first drop in 13 months, easing down to 5.28 percent, it is only a seasonal change and short-lived.
Because of partisan bickering, economic reality got mired in political ideology, especially during the Dec. 1 election campaign. Pro-China opposition parties often blame Taiwan's economic malaise on the ruling DPP's lack of administrative experience and its failure to further Taiwan-China integration. Together with pro-China businesses and media, they successfully pressed the government to ease the "No Haste, Be Patient" (
Before the Dec. 1 elections, Mainland Affairs Council Chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen (
Can Taiwan's economic slump be turned around by the new cross-strait investment policy? The answer is no. Taiwan has become a highly open economy after launching a series of tariff reductions and trade liberalization measures beginning in the late 1980s. Taiwan is integrated into the global economy, forcing it to specialize in an ever-narrowing range of the world's industries. Today, the world's largest wafer foundry -- belonging to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (台積電) -- can even serve as a barometer of the global semiconductor industry. Industry specialization enhances economic efficiency, while exposing an open economy to global business cycles.
Taiwan will become a WTO member on Tuesday. This will hasten globalization and further deepen Taiwan's industrial specialization, not only making pronounced economic fluctuations unavoidable, but also increasingly limiting the government's short-term ability to fine-tune the nation's economy through traditional monetary and fiscal polices.
Taiwan's economic fluctuations are synchronized with world economies and, in particular, the US economy. After five years of technology-led expansion, US economic activity peaked in March of last year and has since slipped into recession. Simultaneously, its main trading partners were dragged into a severe economic downturn.
There is no panacea for a small open economy to fight worldwide recession. Macroeconomic fine-tuning policies, such as lower interest rates, currency devaluation and fiscal expansion, are needed to help mitigate economic recession, but they only have limited effects on a small, open and highly specialized economy, like Taiwan's.
In fact, the government should focus more attention on microeconomic policies designed to, among other things, solidify the economy's tax base, improve financial market efficiency, spur product and process innovation, strengthen intellectual property rights protection and make the education system more responsive to changing labor market demands.
What matters is whether Taiwan's economy is resilient enough to synchronize with the forthcoming global recovery in the short run and also viable enough to prosper in the long run. Easing China-bound investment to further integrate Taiwan into the hostile, developing Chinese economy is not only unnecessary but dangerous.
Hwan C. Lin is an associate professor of the Economics Department, University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS