Now that a decision has been made to deny parole to the serial rapist surnamed Yang (Sept. 1, front page) and perhaps now that the event is passed, a small amount of reason can be injected into the discussion.
A couple of preliminary comments are in order. First, note that I do not refer to him by his media name the "Hwakang Wolf." I have a marked distaste for media monikers for criminals. They tend to either glamorize or trivialize the situation.
Second, I am not going to state whether I think Yang should have been paroled or not. I was not and am not privy to information upon which I could base a rational opinion. Neither are 99.9 percent of the people who have commented on the case.
The third comment I would make is that parole is always a gamble. It can be and should be an informed gamble, but it is ultimately a gamble. Statistics by their very nature can merely tell you the odds; the odds for example of a parolee committing the same or a similar offense. The fancy criminal law term for this is recidivism.
If parole is a gamble why should societies take it? There are two main reasons for a parole system; one lofty, the other mundane. The lofty reason is that a parole system encourages rehabilitation and shows that society can accept the idea that convicts can change their "evil ways."
The mundane and, from a practical point of view, the more important reason is because the parole period allows for a convict to be out in society but still under the partial control of prison officials. Without a parole system, convicts are dumped directly back into society at the end of their prison terms without any control by the authorities. Parole, although prison officials are loath to admit it, is also a standard solution for reducing prison overcrowding and costs.
A short but insightful article on sex offenders and recidivism appeared in the September 1997 edition of the US journal Federal Sentencing Reporter.
In that article the author, Eric Lotke, writes "... only a minority of identified sex offenders reoffend. Over 80 percent never offend again, almost the opposite of what much of the public and many government officials believe, and substantially lower than for many other types of crime."
The lesson to draw from this is that if the public wants to be safe from sexual re-offenders, the solution is to ensure funds for a professional, adequately staffed and trained parole system. Long-term therapy and strategies designed to normalize and reintegrate the lives of offenders in the community are the most promising paths toward public safety.
Brian Kennedy is an attorney who writes and teaches on criminal justice and human rights issues.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused