It should come as no surprise to the organizers of the World Conference Against Racism that many US activists want to hijack this conference that started in Durban on Friday to force a debate about how it is that the US' "war on drugs" has turned into an apartheid-like device that imprisons black men at 13 times the rate of white men.
I wish them luck -- any effort to lift the drugs debate out of the intellectual doldrums where policy makers insist on sleeping on the facts is to be welcomed. For a society that prides itself on its innovative technological life and its rigorous political debates its attitudes to drug use are nothing less that extraordinary. Solid facts are dismissed and old prejudices are fanned into flames. The US is paying a terrible price for burying its head in the sand -- and in the process, because of its tremendous influence as the world's largest drug-consuming society, criminalizing and thence corrupting drug producing societies, besides making it difficult for other western drug consuming countries to reform their antiquated laws too, lest they merely import other countries' problems.
ILLUSTRATION: YU SHA
The first question to ask -- long before one gets into the more supercharged debate on whether prohibition is counterproductive -- is how racially discriminatory application of drug laws can be justified? Unless a society is publicly committed to an apartheid society -- which the US manifestly is not -- how can it be that US penal justice delivers an outcome whereby blacks are only 13 percent of drug users but receive 74 percent of prison sentences for drug abuse? US prisons are now swollen with vast numbers of young non-violent black males, many of them teenagers who, if they had been white, would not have ended up there. Under a law passed during the 1986 hysteria about the spread of crack cocaine (an adulterated form of cocaine popular among poorer people), it takes only one hundredth the amount of crack to trigger the same mandatory sentence as powder cocaine, the drug of choice of white professionals.
Yet real drug abuse in the US is not rising. The US heroin epidemic peaked as long ago as 1973 and the number of youngsters experimenting with cocaine or heroin has remained fairly steady, despite the dramatic fall in prices over the years, a consequence of an enforcement program that for all its harsh rhetoric is an abysmal failure where it counts -- on the supply front.
Any disinterested and intellectually fair appraisal of the western drug scene would have to accept that tobacco kills proportionately more smokers than heroin kills its users and alcohol kills more drinkers than cocaine kills its takers. Of all the drugs tobacco is the most addictive and even a majority of heroin takers -- the second most addictive drug-do not become addicted and can live normal lives (as long as they don't drive under the influence) if they limit it to the occasional recreational use.
There is a shibboleth that those who begin with marijuana are on a slippery slope to imbibing harder drugs. But the vast majority are not, any more than wine drinkers end up on half a bottle of whisky a day. What is true is that as beer and wine drinkers get older they tend to gravitate to spirits, whereas the evidence shows that marijuana and cocaine users as they age tend to cut down on the habit. In fact most, by the time they start to raise a family, have more or less given it up.
Would-be reformers feel that they are beating their heads against a wall: political opinion across the spectrum seems united against them. Yet chinks of light regularly appear. In Britain, for example, which has been as conservative about the issue as its US cousin the doctors' journal, The Lancet, has voiced its opinion that marijuana smoking in reasonable amounts is not dangerous to health, various senior policemen have gone on the record against making smoking marijuana a criminal offense and, most recently, Michael Portillo, a serious candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party has called for a relaxation of the law. Even Britain's conservative-dominated press has begun to allow a more open debate, led by the highbrow Economist magazine, which would like to see all drugs decriminalized. A swing in opinion could perhaps happen in America too. At the time of America's 1928 election no one hardly dared say a word against prohibition. Four years later the mood had totally changed.
What turned the US electorate then was the alarming rate of growth of gangland violence. Perhaps the same process of revulsion could be under way today. As the US gets more drawn into the drug wars of Colombia, the world's largest producer of cocaine, it will realize it is beating a path to a dead -- and deadly -- end.
Two decades ago it was the rise of the Colombian mafia that undermined and corrupted both governments and the agencies of law enforcement right across the Americas. Today it is the rise of the drug-fuelled armies that is turning Colombia into a battleground that step-by-step is drawing the US into another unwinnable war.
Legalization will not be easy -- too much water has gone under the bridge for the transition to be a smooth one. But it has to be done and rather quickly too. The drug mafia have to have the carpet pulled from under them; the young blacks have to be sprung from the US' jails; and the vast budget spent mainly on the enforcement of fruitless anti-drug laws needs to be diverted to treatment centers and the education of society of the uselessness of all excess, whether it be tobacco, alcohol or drugs.
Jonathan Power is a freelance columnist based in London.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused