In the classic board game of Monopoly if you are rich enough and lucky enough you can get the much coveted "get out of jail free" card. This card allows a player who is unlucky enough to land on the "jail square" to pass through without having to lose a turn. In a game where getting around the board and buying and selling is the key to winning, the "get out of jail card" is worth its weight in gold. Taiwan's legislators have an unlimited supply of get out of jail free cards. They are provided in the ROC Constitution.
The fact that the Constitution provides what amounts to an absolute shield, as a practical matter, for any legislator to be immune from all criminal arrest and detentions is a situation that must change. I agree very much with the recent editorial (Aug. 28, page 8) that said, "there should be no holiday from justice" for legislators. In addition to the measures mentioned in that editorial, I would go further and recommend that the Council of Grand Justices hand down an "interpretation" of Special Article 4, the one providing the immunity for legislators, which effectively eliminates the protection. In lieu of that, a constitutional amendment should be passed to remove the protections of Special Article 4.
I am enough of a "Taiwan realist" to realize that neither situation is likely to happen in this eon. One defense frequently put forward to support legislative immunity is "oh, the US Constitution has the same immunity for legislators and it is a mature democracy, Taiwan should have it too." That is incorrect. The relevant passage in the US Constitution is Article 1 section 6 [1], which states: "They [members of Congress] shall in all cases, except treason, felony and breach of the peace, be privileged from arrest during their attendance..." On the very face of it the US Constitution's immunity is very different from Taiwan's. Congressmen can be arrested for all felonies. The Taiwanese Constitution's immunity is for all crimes, no matter how minor or how serious, unless the good legislator is actually caught in the act.
The US Supreme Court, very early on in its history, made clear that the Constitution provided very little immunity for Congressmen. As the Cornell Law school commentary on the Constitution correctly points out "This clause is practically obsolete. It applies only to arrests in civil suits, which were still common in this country at the time the Constitution was adopted. It does not apply to service of process in either civil or criminal cases. Nor does it apply to arrest in any criminal case. The phrase `treason, felony or breach of the peace' is interpreted to withdraw all criminal offenses from the operation of the privilege."
The US Supreme Court's major case on this privilege is Williamson v. United States. Although it was decided in 1908, it has a very modern relevance. Williamson was a legislator who was "indicted for allegedly conspiring to commit the crime of subornation of perjury in proceedings for the purchase of public land under the authority of the law." That sounds like something I read in the paper recently; land fraud dressed up to appear lawful, followed by lies.
The Williamson case discusses at length the history of legislator immunity and makes clear that even in the early history of the Common Law in England members of Parliament had no immunity from criminal prosecutions.
Put most simply, there is no basis in Anglo-American constitutional law for legislators to have "get out of jail for free" cards. It is time for Taiwan to end this practice as well.
Brian Kennedy is a member of the Board of Amnesty International Taiwan and of the Taiwan Association for Human Rights.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS