On April 26th, Taiwanese media reported that significant military movement had been detected on mainland China which indicated the likely preparation for large-scale military maneuvers. The next day, the Associated Press reported that two Chinese F-8 fighters were scrambled to shadow an US spy plane flying in international airspace over the South China Sea.
On Sunday April 30th, the US Department of Defense ordered the USS Kitty Hawk to steam for Taiwanese waters on the same day the Taipei Times carried an opinion article which said, "So long as Taiwan refuses to forfeit its sovereignty, a Chinese invasion of the island is virtually unavoidable. Taiwanese President-elect Chen Shui-bian's (
Is war possible between Taiwan and the Peoples Republic of China? If so, would this war involve the US? If it did, could the US military handle that mission?
On the first question, the answer is an unequivocal yes; war is a distinct possibility between Taiwan and China. The second question is a little more murky -- by design -- but the answer is very probably; if China made an unprovoked attack against Taiwan, the US would almost certainly come to their defense. But the answer to the third question is the most crucial of all for Americans, and its answer is not likely.
Military and foreign affairs pundits the world over have explored, analyzed, and dissected the question of whether the Chinese military even has the ability to conduct cross-strait operations. What goes accepted as fact and virtually without discussion is that they are no match for the military prowess of the US, and could never win a face-to-face confrontation. But is that assumption valid?
I believe it is not.
Since the Persian Gulf War, the US military has undergone several crucial changes that on the surface and, viewed individually, seem to be of little consequence; but in toto have severely degraded our ability to conduct sustained military operations against a legitimate foe.
Some of the more serious of these issues are: the change in focus from engaging in combat operations to an emphasis on peacekeeping operations; the de-masculinization of the armed forces through the lessening of rigorous standards; and the failure to reorganize outdated military structures in light of the obvious revolution in military affairs. Added to this is the reality of a strong domestic economy in the US, and the sagging appeal of the armed forces and the spartan conditions and pay to mainstream American men.
The result of the malaise is that the fighting strength of the US military is now but a shell of its 1991 strength. In the three to five years prior to the Persian Gulf war, the US military in general and the army in particular, had trained to impressive levels. Still patrolling the East-West border between NATO and the Warsaw Pact, training and preparation for a possible large-scale war was an ever-present reality. That prevailing condition provided unambiguous focus. Consequently, when that trained and ready military force was brought to bear against Saddam Hussein, it crushed him with impunity.
That force no longer exists.
Though the highest ranking, politicized generals of todays US Armed Forces would argue vigorously to the contrary, and no doubt feign insult that their ability to engage in significant combat operations was questioned, the reality is evident for anyone to see who is willing to look: Years of retraining our combat forces for peacekeeping duty and the endless string of overseas deployment has considerably dulled Americas fighting edge; the reduction in the manpower levels of over 250,000 in the army alone; the significantly reduced level of field training for the land forces that remain; and retention and recruiting levels at post-World War II lows.
The solution to this crisis of readiness is not in simply pouring more money into the defense budget; that would actually serve to exacerbate the problem. The answer lies in meaningful reform and reorganization. Texas Governor George W. Bush openly proclaims on his Web site that if elected to the presidency he will rebuild the military. We must certainly hope so. For simply trying to graft add-on improvements to the current faulty system will ultimately lead to failure and failure on the battlefield is defined in terms of lost vital national interests -- and in the spilled blood of America's finest.
Daniel L. Davis is a former military and foreign affairs aide to US Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison and is currently a Captain in the US Army Reserve.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused