On March 7, Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi -- disregarding Chinese Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing's (
If we look closer, a number of facts lie behind Japan's stance, including repeated incursions into its waters by Chinese nuclear-powered submarines, the sovereignty dispute over the Tiaoyutai and China's military budget, which has grown by double-digit figures for 16 consecutive years.
Taiwan has kept a low profile on this development, and has purposely not linked it to China's notorious "anti-secession" law, so as to avoid Chinese interference in a more formal partnership among Taiwan, Japan and the US in the future. Nevertheless, the future of the US-Japan alliance and relations with China, as well as their impact on the cross-strait situation have received global attention.
Beijing, apart from lobbying the EU to lift an arms embargo against China, also outlined three conditions for using the "anti-secession" law during a meeting of the National People's Congress' on March 8. The law authorizes the military to block Taiwan independence by using "non-peaceful means." Obviously, it was a move against the joint statement of the US-Japan Security Consultative Committee.
The next day, US officials immediately reacted to China's destruction of the balance of power in the Strait, saying that the law contradicts the gradual warming of cross-strait relations. They called on Beijing to reconsider it, saying that Washington "opposes any attempt to determine the future of Taiwan by other than peaceful means."
They also hinted that, apart from issuing a tougher statement after the law is passed, Washington will further show its concern during Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's visit to Beijing.
Meanwhile, some members of the US Congress have already launched a petition against the law. Viewed from this angle, Washington's strategic global deployment can be seen -- with the US-Japan alliance being made the pillar of security in the Asia-Pacific region in order to restrain China from breaking through the island chain.
Taiwan is one of the countries peripheral to the US-Japan alliance. Taiwan should make use of the developments of both the US-Japan joint statement and China's law. Strategically, it should adjust its actions to the circumstances to give full play to its crucial position in the island chain. The following are my suggestions for the national security agencies.
First, Taiwan can open a window of opportunity by strengthening the US-Japan alliance. In the short term, it should focus on how to rapidly promote favorable policies. In the long term, it should integrate its various diplomatic, military and economic resources related to the US and Japan, and seek to play the role of an active strategic partner.
Second, although Taiwan is backed by the US-Japan security cooperation, the lack of an official military partnership with the two countries makes it necessary to declare its determination to defend itself to the world through "reasonable and practical" arms procurements.
Finally, in terms of military exchanges, Taiwan should cultivate talented people who are sophisticated in dealing with the US and Japan, and build a preliminary military exchange mechanism with Japan through the US. They can even push for triangular "war games" through private think tanks.
Henry Liu is the chief of the international news section at the Ministry of National Defense's military spokesman office. The views expressed in this article are his own and do not necessarily represent MND policy.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
RSS