On Dec. 27, China's State Council issued a white paper entitled China's National Defense in 2004. Last March, the re-election of President Chen Shui-bian (
Sensing that Taiwan is striding forward to become a sovereign and normal country, Beijing has resorted to publishing this white paper in a last-ditch effort to explicitly and threateningly point out that "Taiwan's authorities under Chen Shui-bian have deliberately challenged the status quo of both sides belonging to the same one China and obviously escalated the Taiwan independence activities designed to split China. The separatist activities of Taiwan's independence forces have increasingly become the biggest immediate threat to China's sovereignty and territorial integrity as well as peace and stability on both sides of the Taiwan Strait and the Asia-Pacific region as a whole."
The document also criticizes the attempt to enact a new constitution as "effecting Taiwan's independence through the formation of a so-called constitutional reform," and strongly indicates that "it was the sacred responsibility of the Chinese army to deter Taiwan's independence forces from splitting the country."
The white paper went on to repeat the threat that "should the Taiwan authorities go so far as to make a reckless attempt that
constitutes a major incident of `Taiwan independence,' the Chinese people and armed forces will resolutely and thoroughly crush it at any cost."
Other than threatening the use of military coercion against "Taiwan independence forces," the white paper also offers Taiwan a chance to surrender itself, saying that "hostilities could be ended or a confidence-building mechanism in the military field could be established if Taiwan accepted the `one China' principle and stopped its separatist activities."
Emphasizing China's intention to strengthen its military, the paper also mentions that "based on economic development and financial revenues, China will continue to `moderately' increase its defense expenditure." China's national defense budget expenditure has increased at a double-digit rate since 1998. The document reveals that defense expenditure increased to 211.701 billion yuan last year (US$25.6 billion) from 190.787 billion yuan (US$23.1 billion) in 2003, an increase of 12 percent, which trails only the US and Russia.
Since China is in the habit of hiding its defense expenditure in the budgets of non-defense departments, China's actual defense spending is believed to be at least three times greater than that of the figure released publicly. With such a huge amount of money invested in its military buildup, the imbalance of military power looms ahead across the Taiwan Strait, seriously threatening the security of Taiwan.
The white paper also pointed out that China has undergone two rounds of large-scale military cutbacks, laying off up to 1.5 million personnel and plans to cut a further 200,000 by the end of the year.
To cope with the Taiwan issue, the paper also mentions that the People's Liberation Army (PLA), in addition to continuing to modernize its armed forces, will also strengthen its control of the sea, broaden the reach of military operations in coastal waters, and enhance its defense in depth and amphibious capability. To have command of the air, the strategy will be changed from territorial air defense to having both a offensive and defensive capabilities. The Second Artillery Corps, China's strategic missile forces, will improve their rapid response and precision targeting capabilities.
The white paper, which Beijing professes is a national defense policy of a defensive nature, turns out to be a policy that allows the defense budget to constantly expand, deploys more than 600 ballistic missiles in coastal areas targeting Taiwan, and organizes all types of bombers and deploys mid- and long-range ballistic missiles covering the whole of East Asia and all US military bases in the Asia-Pacific region.
Besides criticizing Taiwan's independence forces, Beijing has also pinpointed Washington as an accomplice in fostering Taiwan's independence.
In 2002, an annual report on China's military power, released by the Pentagon, said that "the major drive for the accelerated military modernization programs of China are preparations made by China for the potential clash of both sides of the Taiwan Strait and are seeking to intimidate, deter and strike any foreign forces supporting Taiwan."
The paper says bluntly that "the United States has on many occasions reaffirmed adherence to the one-China policy, observance of the three joint communiques and opposition to `Taiwan independence.' However, it continues to increase, quantitatively and qualitatively, its arms sales to Taiwan, sending a wrong signal to the Taiwan authorities. The US action does not serve a stable situation across the Taiwan Strait."
It adds: "The Chinese people are resolutely opposed to all separatist activities in whatever manifestation aimed at `Taiwan independence,' to foreign interference of any form, and to arms sales to Taiwan or entrance to military alliance of any form with Taiwan by any country in the world. We will never allow anyone to split Taiwan from China through whatever means."
Naturally, Beijing sees the US, which has said it will do whatever it takes to help Taiwan defend itself and to strengthen its self-defense capability, as a thorn in its side and the PLA views the US as a hypothetical enemy.
China's three types of warfare against Taiwan are already in full swing. It is engaging in psychological, media and legal warfare against Taiwan. China utilizes invisible psychological and media warfare to disturb Taiwan's people and create a false impression of "one China" in the international community. To make matters worse, countries such as France and Germany are irresponsibly pushing for a lifting of the arms embargo against China. As part of legal warfare against Taiwan, it has sent an anti-secession bill to the National People's Congress, paving the way for providing "legal" grounds for invasion.
In contrast, the arms procurement deal that Taiwan bent over backwards to obtain is still being obstructed by opposition parties in the legislature simply for the sake of opposition. As a result, the arms purchase special budget has not been subjected to the scrutiny of the legislature.
If the defense capability of Taiwan makes no progress, how is it going to cope with the PLA? Even Taiwan's international friends kindly urged it to face up to the military threat posed by China. Taiwan's politicians, however, are still unconcerned about the issue and Taiwanese people are also not alert to the seriousness of the matter. Therefore, the road for maintaining national security remains a difficult one.
Chang Sheng-hwa is a political commentator based in Taipei.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
Sitting in their homes typing on their keyboards and posting on Facebook things like, “Taiwan has already lost its democracy,” “The Democratic Progressive Party is a party of green communists,” or “President William Lai [賴清德] is a dictator,” then turning around and heading to the convenience store to buy a tea egg and an iced Americano, casually chatting in a Line group about which news broadcast was more biased this morning — are such people truly clear about the kind of society in which they are living? This is not meant to be sarcasm or criticism, but an exhausted honesty.
Much has been said about the significance of the recall vote, but here is what must be said clearly and without euphemism: This vote is not just about legislative misconduct. It is about defending Taiwan’s sovereignty against a “united front” campaign that has crept into the heart of our legislature. Taiwanese voters on Jan. 13 last year made a complex decision. Many supported William Lai (賴清德) for president to keep Taiwan strong on the world stage. At the same time, some hoped that giving the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) a legislative majority would offer a
RSS