On Dec. 27, China's State Council issued a white paper entitled China's National Defense in 2004. Last March, the re-election of President Chen Shui-bian (
Sensing that Taiwan is striding forward to become a sovereign and normal country, Beijing has resorted to publishing this white paper in a last-ditch effort to explicitly and threateningly point out that "Taiwan's authorities under Chen Shui-bian have deliberately challenged the status quo of both sides belonging to the same one China and obviously escalated the Taiwan independence activities designed to split China. The separatist activities of Taiwan's independence forces have increasingly become the biggest immediate threat to China's sovereignty and territorial integrity as well as peace and stability on both sides of the Taiwan Strait and the Asia-Pacific region as a whole."
The document also criticizes the attempt to enact a new constitution as "effecting Taiwan's independence through the formation of a so-called constitutional reform," and strongly indicates that "it was the sacred responsibility of the Chinese army to deter Taiwan's independence forces from splitting the country."
The white paper went on to repeat the threat that "should the Taiwan authorities go so far as to make a reckless attempt that
constitutes a major incident of `Taiwan independence,' the Chinese people and armed forces will resolutely and thoroughly crush it at any cost."
Other than threatening the use of military coercion against "Taiwan independence forces," the white paper also offers Taiwan a chance to surrender itself, saying that "hostilities could be ended or a confidence-building mechanism in the military field could be established if Taiwan accepted the `one China' principle and stopped its separatist activities."
Emphasizing China's intention to strengthen its military, the paper also mentions that "based on economic development and financial revenues, China will continue to `moderately' increase its defense expenditure." China's national defense budget expenditure has increased at a double-digit rate since 1998. The document reveals that defense expenditure increased to 211.701 billion yuan last year (US$25.6 billion) from 190.787 billion yuan (US$23.1 billion) in 2003, an increase of 12 percent, which trails only the US and Russia.
Since China is in the habit of hiding its defense expenditure in the budgets of non-defense departments, China's actual defense spending is believed to be at least three times greater than that of the figure released publicly. With such a huge amount of money invested in its military buildup, the imbalance of military power looms ahead across the Taiwan Strait, seriously threatening the security of Taiwan.
The white paper also pointed out that China has undergone two rounds of large-scale military cutbacks, laying off up to 1.5 million personnel and plans to cut a further 200,000 by the end of the year.
To cope with the Taiwan issue, the paper also mentions that the People's Liberation Army (PLA), in addition to continuing to modernize its armed forces, will also strengthen its control of the sea, broaden the reach of military operations in coastal waters, and enhance its defense in depth and amphibious capability. To have command of the air, the strategy will be changed from territorial air defense to having both a offensive and defensive capabilities. The Second Artillery Corps, China's strategic missile forces, will improve their rapid response and precision targeting capabilities.
The white paper, which Beijing professes is a national defense policy of a defensive nature, turns out to be a policy that allows the defense budget to constantly expand, deploys more than 600 ballistic missiles in coastal areas targeting Taiwan, and organizes all types of bombers and deploys mid- and long-range ballistic missiles covering the whole of East Asia and all US military bases in the Asia-Pacific region.
Besides criticizing Taiwan's independence forces, Beijing has also pinpointed Washington as an accomplice in fostering Taiwan's independence.
In 2002, an annual report on China's military power, released by the Pentagon, said that "the major drive for the accelerated military modernization programs of China are preparations made by China for the potential clash of both sides of the Taiwan Strait and are seeking to intimidate, deter and strike any foreign forces supporting Taiwan."
The paper says bluntly that "the United States has on many occasions reaffirmed adherence to the one-China policy, observance of the three joint communiques and opposition to `Taiwan independence.' However, it continues to increase, quantitatively and qualitatively, its arms sales to Taiwan, sending a wrong signal to the Taiwan authorities. The US action does not serve a stable situation across the Taiwan Strait."
It adds: "The Chinese people are resolutely opposed to all separatist activities in whatever manifestation aimed at `Taiwan independence,' to foreign interference of any form, and to arms sales to Taiwan or entrance to military alliance of any form with Taiwan by any country in the world. We will never allow anyone to split Taiwan from China through whatever means."
Naturally, Beijing sees the US, which has said it will do whatever it takes to help Taiwan defend itself and to strengthen its self-defense capability, as a thorn in its side and the PLA views the US as a hypothetical enemy.
China's three types of warfare against Taiwan are already in full swing. It is engaging in psychological, media and legal warfare against Taiwan. China utilizes invisible psychological and media warfare to disturb Taiwan's people and create a false impression of "one China" in the international community. To make matters worse, countries such as France and Germany are irresponsibly pushing for a lifting of the arms embargo against China. As part of legal warfare against Taiwan, it has sent an anti-secession bill to the National People's Congress, paving the way for providing "legal" grounds for invasion.
In contrast, the arms procurement deal that Taiwan bent over backwards to obtain is still being obstructed by opposition parties in the legislature simply for the sake of opposition. As a result, the arms purchase special budget has not been subjected to the scrutiny of the legislature.
If the defense capability of Taiwan makes no progress, how is it going to cope with the PLA? Even Taiwan's international friends kindly urged it to face up to the military threat posed by China. Taiwan's politicians, however, are still unconcerned about the issue and Taiwanese people are also not alert to the seriousness of the matter. Therefore, the road for maintaining national security remains a difficult one.
Chang Sheng-hwa is a political commentator based in Taipei.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS