It was a bizarre day in political circles yesterday. People First Party (PFP) legislators argued among themselves about supporting a proposed statute relating to the investigation and disposal of assets obtained by political parties and affiliated agencies -- a bill targeting assets stolen by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over 50 years of rule.
Later, some Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators also had an argument among themselves over a list of appointments for the Control Yuan proposed by President Chen Shui-bian (
Yesterday's farce on the legislative floor was a reprise of the conflict preceding the legislative elections on Dec. 11. On the one hand, the PFP's internal squabbling was triggered out of political self-interest, resulting in obstruction of the bill. The party has clearly already forgotten its campaign promise -- a mere 10 days since being elected. Before the elections, PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) repeatedly said that the KMT must clarify its position on party assets as a condition for the two parties to merge. Now, both PFP Vice Chairman Chang Chao-hsiung (張昭雄) and caucus whip Liu Wen-hsiung (劉文雄) have called on the KMT "to return what belongs to the nation and the public." Yet these encouraging words have been overwhelmed with pressure exerted by different political interests inside the PFP. As a result, there is no review in sight for this bill.
Meanwhile, the DPP legislators say Chen's nominations for the Control Yuan do not accord with his election promises. They have asked that party discipline not be applied to them if they vote against the appointments, and have threatened to resign in protest if it is.
What is noteworthy is that such dramas, playing out in the legislature on the same day, reveal a distinct political mentality. The courageous DPP legislators who criticized their party and held firm to their political principles should be applauded.
It is encouraging to see matters of right and wrong coming to the fore at this time, because a political party's healthy development depends to a large extent on the trust it is able to inspire in the public. It is common knowledge that resolution of the party assets issue is something that the great majority of people have wanted for some time. There are even a good number of KMT legislators who favor resolution of this matter so that the issue does not hamper the party's chances of regaining power at a later date.
But the excuse offered by the rump of the PFP in blocking the bill -- that the DPP's unwillingness to accept its support is a tactic to cause a rift in the pan-blue camp -- is sheer sophistry. It is precisely this kind of short-sighted thinking that led to the PFP being rejected by the electorate in the elections, in the form of 12 lost seats.
By insisting that appointments to the Control Yuan be subject to scrutiny by the people's representatives in both the ruling and opposition parties, the DPP legislators are standing by their political principles and putting the public interest ahead of their own -- and their party's. The PFP should heed this warning: If it continues to treat matters of public interest with such comprehensive negligence, it will eventually be rejected by the public altogether and go up in smoke.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS