Vote wisely, vote DPP
Even as a Singaporean, I share the sentiments of President Chen Shui-bian (
Based on the actions and behavior of Lien and Soong since March 20, when they again lost the presidential election to Chen, I have no doubts that both men still harbor the ambition of becoming president in 2008. And that is indeed a shame, for both men's blind and selfish desire, or should I say egoistic wish, to become president has resulted in them preventing other, younger leaders such as Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) from seeking a ticket for the presidential election.
Both Lien and Soong are already in their 60s, and instead of planning for leadership renewal in their respective parties, they instead shamelessly sought to consolidate their power. And this despite Taiwanese voters having rejected both men at the presidential polls in 2000 and this year. Are they seeking a hat-trick of rejections by the voters in the 2008 presidential election? Surely such an "achievement" would warrant a place in the Guinness Book of World of Records?
As a concerned observer and friend of Taiwan, I am happy with Chen's election victory on March 20. However, the decision by the majority of voters to choose Chen as their leader for the next four years is but half a step forward to safeguard the interests and sovereignty of Taiwan. The other half-step would be taken when the voters elect a majority of DPP candidates in the legislative elections.
A reason why US President George W. Bush was able to gain support from Americans for his foreign policies over the past four years was mainly because he enjoyed the Republicans' strong support in both the Senate and House of Representatives.
Similarly, Chen requires the support of his DPP legislative colleagues to push for more reforms for Taiwan, which could only result in a better and more democratic and prosperous Taiwan four years down the road.
Given the exposed nature and character of both Lien and Soong, a non-DPP majority in the legislature will only result in the KMT-PFP legislators working together to sabotage the policies which Chen may intend to adopt over the next four years. Lien and Soong should learn a lesson or two about grace and humility from US Senator John Kerry, who conceded defeat to Bush within hours of the election results being released and even pledged to work together with Bush to unify the US. On the other hand, Lien and Soong sought to further divide Taiwan after their election defeats. A further divided Taiwan would only please communist China, and as such, we can deduce whose interests Lien and Soong are indeed seeking to further.
Taiwanese voters must be convinced that Chen is the right man to lead the nation of 23 million citizens forward. The voters' choice of Chen in 2000 and this year are two steps forward, but should the DPP fail to win a majority in the coming legislative election, that would be two steps backward. Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen have both worked hard and courageously to build a Taiwanese individual identity, with Taiwan as a sovereign nation.
The voters must not allow such hard work to be wasted by the actions and agenda of a few elderly men who apparently seem more intent on serving their own interests.
As a foreigner, it is my humble wish to see a more progressive Taiwan, free of threats from any other nations. And that would only be possible with a clear DPP victory at the polls next Saturday. On Dec. 11, I will be watching Taiwanese pop princess Jolin Tsai (
The future of Taiwan could be affected by the election results next weekend. I urge Taiwanese to vote wisely -- there is only one apparent and clear voice -- the DPP. Support Chen and the DPP to further improve the lives of Taiwanese and the strength of Taiwan as a sovereign nation.
Jason Lee Boon Hong
Singapore
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS