The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is pathetic. Before the presidential elections, it planned to sell its China Television Company, but was stopped by the Government Information Office.
Next, the pan-green camp launched a high-profile investigation into KMT assets, the Executive Yuan accused the Broadcasting Corporation of China of plundering public assets, and Premier Yu Shyi-kun was quoted as saying that getting back the stolen assets pillaged by the KMT would provide money for elementary and junior high school students to have free textbooks. Recently, the headquarters of China Television Company was impounded due to the Procomp Informatics Co financial scandal.
With access to funds blocked, the KMT said it had problems with capital turnover, was unable to pay salaries and was short of money to fund its election campaign. The leader of the KMT has not only been beaten from pillar to post by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), but even the proposed "nuptials" with the People First Party now seem anything but certain.Without its once-abundant funds, how is the KMT going to fight the upcoming legislative elections?
Presidential Office Secretary-General Su Tseng-chang (
For example, President Chen Shui-bian's (
The pan-blues, on the contrary, have nothing to keep them busy. As a result, they can only reminisce about their glorious past and wallow in despair. This is actually not a false accusation brought against the leaders of the pan-blues. For the past few months, apart from questioning the honesty of Chen, the pan-blues have not come up with any constructive ideas in cross-strait policies, or on domestic, diplomatic or national defense issues. Their cross-strait policy is simply a restatement of "one China," and "maintaining the status quo." In domestic affairs, the KMT is merely bidding against the DPP on the national pension issue, and it opposes the DPP's educational reform without putting forward any ideas of its own. The KMT has shown itself unable to take a lead in the growing anti-arms procurement movement. If the pan-blues ruled Taiwan they would not shorten the list for arms procurement, but they currently accuse the DPP of using arms procurement as preparation for independence.
The reason why legislative elections are devoid of excitement is because it is usually up to the opposition -- in this case the blue camp -- to challenge the government and get the debate going. Over the past four years, the KMT has often accused the DPP of not having learned how to govern. Looking at the current situation, we see that the DPP is increasingly capable of ruling but that the blue camp is still the same as it was before March 2000.
Why is this so? Because the blue camp was convinced it would win this year's presidential elections and return to power, so its four years in opposition were spent in the same frame of mind as Chiang Kai-shek's (
First, for the past four years, it still has not changed its administrative framework and continues to pay high salaries to political officials to do desultory research studies in the hope of using their expertise to rule Taiwan in four years time.
Second, the size of the KMT's headquarters has not changed greatly, for they hoped to use this election machine to regain power.
Third, there was no pressure to sort out the party assets issue in a timely fashion, because if the KMT had won the presidential elections, no one would dare pursue the matter.
After four years, the KMT has been unable to regain power. Its bureaucrats, for lack of a political stage, are becoming obsolete and the party machine is too rusty to operate properly. Only now is the KMT starting to face facts. It is withdrawing privileges from high-ranking officials who no longer hold office, cutting down on staff, selling its assets, and coming up with some creative ideas.
All of this may be too late. The increasingly competent DPP will not give the KMT any more opportunities to manage their unsold assets, and the KMT is becoming ever more burdened by all its expropriated possessions.
It is not hard to understand why KMT leaders such as Lien have such strong feelings about the March 19 shooting incident. If Lien had been elected, everything would be different; he would not be busy trying to make ends meet and accosted over the party assets issue.
Four years ago, Lien was lucky his political fortunes did not sink completely. So like a gambler he put all his hope in this year's March election. Now it's too late: even if the KMT makes an effort now, history may not wait for them.
Ku Er-teh is a freelance writer.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS