Traffic tickets have, surprisingly, become the latest fodder for political mudslinging. The whole thing started when Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
It is hard to not wonder about what has come over Ma in these past weeks. Taking on Chen has seemingly become the new meaning of his existence. The relationship between Ma and Chen has always been rather awkward, to say the least, since Ma is the only pan-blue heavyweight who has defeated Chen in an election. Chen's amazing comeback in winning the presidency and becoming Ma's superior of course added some fascinating twists to the tale.
But Ma's new attacks against Chen are increasingly of a petty and personal nature, over matters such as traffic tickets and jay walking.
If this is all part of the pan-blue camp's campaign strategy for the approaching Legislative Yuan elections, one must doubt how much Ma is actually helping out his camp's candidates. With Ma personally jumping into the spotlight to take on Chen, everything and everyone else -- most notably Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Moreover, in legislative elections, the voters are less likely to vote for political parties and more likely to vote based on their perception of the individual candidates. Under the circumstances, taking on the head of the rival party isn't going to go far in terms of winning votes. Instead, voters will perceive Ma as engaging in a personal, one-on-one battle with Chen.
Ma is no longer simply one of the vice chairmen in the KMT, but someone -- in fact the only one -- who carries enough weight to challenge Chen. It seems natural to consider Ma as the only viable contender from the pan-blue camp for the presidency in 2008. By comparison, Lien and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (
But one cannot help but question Ma's wisdom in choosing the stones being thrown -- focusing on things that some would consider miniscule and petty. It isn't hard to understand Ma's underlying logic. It's his intention to point out that despite Chen's modest background, he is no exception when it comes to abusing privileges and perks. This supposedly will provoke the resentment of common citizens for whom things such as traffic tickets and fines are inescapable facts of life.
The problem is that Ma did not consider the potential backlash his tactics might provoke. If he is going to pester his opponents over minor matters such as traffic tickets, he should make sure that he himself is an exemplary citizen 24 hours a day. But lo and behold, he was immediately caught breaking traffic laws himself -- parking on red lines and extending his arms from the window of a moving vehicles to wave to the crowd. Stories like this make people think "no wonder he did not have to cancel his tickets: the police don't dare give him tickets in the first place."
If what Ma is doing is part of the pan blues' legislative campaign strategy, it is not working too well. They'd better think of something else before their time runs out.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS