At their meeting in Luxemburg on Oct. 11-12, the EU foreign ministers decided to maintain -- for the time being -- the EU arms embargo against China. According to press reports, the EU will review its policy on the basis of three criteria: China's human rights record, tension with Taiwan and the as yet incomplete EU code of conduct on arms exports.
The Beijing authorities have argued that the arms ban is outdated and "a product of the Cold War."
French President Jacques Chirac has echoed this, and has become the EU's strongest advocate for lifting the embargo, no doubt driven by the prospects of lucrative orders for France's military industry. Reportedly, France's enthusiasm is also prompted by the desire to get China's support to have the the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor built at Cadarache, near Tarragone in the south of France.
The fact is, however, that the embargo had nothing to do with the Cold War, but was imposed after China's military crackdown in 1989 on peaceful demonstrators at Tiananmen Square. Since then, China's human rights abuses have continued unabated, and human rights organizations such as Amnesty International have documented that China's human rights record has in effect deteriorated over the past 15 years.
Lifting the embargo under these circumstances would send a distinctly wrong signal to China. The EU should let China know that improvement of human rights is a condition sine qua non for enhancing relations with Europe.
Just as important is stability in the Taiwan Strait: lifting the ban will have far-reaching implications for peace and security in Southeast Asia. It will upset the balance of power in the Taiwan Strait and cause instability in the region.
China itself is the major source of that instability in the Strait. Until now, the EU has hardly given any attention or thought to resolving the issue. Time has come for the EU to join forces with the US in convincing China that Beijing's policies toward Taiwan are an outdated remnant of the Chinese Civil War.
In his Oct. 10 National Day Speech, President Chen Shui-bian (
The EU thus needs to help convince Beijing that Taiwan is not the "arch-enemy" from the days of Chiang Kai-shek's (蔣介石) Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), but that -- after 38 years of martial law -- the Taiwanese people have made an impressive transition to democracy, and strive to live in peace with all their neighbors, including China.
Instead of considering the sale of arms to China, the EU should end its policy of isolating a democratic Taiwan, and work toward normalizing relations with Taipei. Such a policy is based on the basic principles of democracy and the right to self-determination as laid down in the UN Charter. Europe prides itself on its long history of democracy, from the British Magna Charta to the French Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite.
Selling arms to a repressive, communist China so it can threaten a newly free and democratic Taiwan would be a violation of the basic principles we Europeans hold dear. The EU should not let Taiwan remain an orphan, but help make it a full and equal member of the international community.
Gerrit van der Wees is editor of Taiwan Communique, a publication based in Washington.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS