In a recent edition of the genius internet cartoon strip Get Your War On, two anonymous office workers discuss US President George W. Bush's policy on stem cell research.
"If Bush is gonna keep arguing against science," says one, "why not go all the way and argue against gravity? I bet he could convince some of his supporters they were floating."
Whether or not Karl Rove, Bush's political strategist, is focus-grouping the weightlessness claim is unclear. What we do know is that Bush seems to have opened up a War on science, and that women are likely to be among its earliest casualties. Over the summer, Bush revealed plans to appoint another Dubya -- David Hager -- to the reproductive health drugs advisory committee of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This distinguished panel -- whose advice is traditionally adhered to -- makes crucial decisions on matters relating to contraception, infertility treatment, drugs used in obstetrics and gynecology (including hormone therapy) and medical alternatives to surgical procedures for sterilization and abortion.
The fact that the committee's recent 24 to 3 vote in favor of selling the morning-after pill without prescription was mysteriously -- and against almost all precedent -- rejected by the FDA is bad enough. But Hager's appointment is a real shocker.
For those of you unfamiliar with his work, Hager is the author of a book called As Jesus Cared for Women: Restoring Women Then and Now.
It exploits the latest in scientific advances to promote ever more sophisticated female healthcare. It blends biblical accounts of Jesus healing women with case studies from Hager's practice. And what a practice it sounds. Come to David with chronic premenstrual pain and, along with your inferior Earth medicine, he will prescribe you specific Bible readings and prayers to treat the problem. He's not one of your crazy futurists -- he won't dole out contraceptive medicine to anyone unmarried, say, and despite being an ob-gyn, he's a staunch pro-lifer.
All in all, a cracking appointment, and proof of Laura Bush's claim that "the W stands for Women."
But it's not Dubya's only blow for womankind. Last month, at a supporters' rally in Missouri, he bemoaned the spate of "frivolous lawsuits" which had resulted in various medical practitioners being struck off.
"Too many good docs are getting out of business," he opined. "Too many ob-gyns aren't able to practise their love with women all across this country," he said.
What can you say? Other than how heartening it is to see this chap racing ahead of Senator John Kerry in polls of women voters, with the most recent of them suggesting he has a lead of 48 percent to 43 percent, and climbing.
Bush, among other things, has been at pains to point out that it could be so much worse for the ladies: They could be living under the Taliban.
"Young girls were not allowed to go to school," he recalled, misty-eyed, at a recent rally in New Hampshire. "Their mothers were executed in sports stadiums if they stepped out of line."
No mention of the fact that the US military is now attempting to flush out militant warlords in Afghanistan by driving Humvees through their territory, blaring out the ultimate insult, "The Taliban are women! They're bitches!" But hey -- why cloud the issue?
Two weeks ago, the Guardian's New York correspondent Gary Younge wrote an article which analyzed the ways in which both candidates were attempting to appeal to women, married and single, with varying degrees of success. Now, with the Bush lead among female voters seemingly opening up, the incumbent's personal view of women is becoming clearer. The more speeches you hear, the more Laura Bush is wheeled out to talk about national security being the bedrock of family life, and the more he appoints people such as Hager to scientific policy bodies, the more suspiciously weirdo it all sounds. What emerges is a quasi-mystical view of women, as beings in need of special protection, of rules where their own bodies are concerned, of a firm but loving hand. Hell, in need of prayer.
There was a telling little exchange in the televised debate with Kerry last week, in which the Democrat acknowledged that he and Bush were fathers of two daughters, and that he had chuckled at some of the Bush twins' less guarded comments.
"I'm trying to put a leash on them," smiled Bush.
Suddenly, an edge crept into the room. "I've learned not to do that," shot back Kerry.
You have to wish him all the best.
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
On April 11, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivered a speech at a joint meeting of the US Congress in Washington, in which he said that “China’s current external stance and military actions present an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge … to the peace and stability of the international community.” Kishida emphasized Japan’s role as “the US’ closest ally.” “The international order that the US worked for generations to build is facing new challenges,” Kishida said. “I understand it is a heavy burden to carry such hopes on your shoulders,” he said. “Japan is already standing shoulder to shoulder
Former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) used to push for reforms to protect Taiwan by adopting the “three noes” policy as well as “Taiwanization.” Later, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) wished to save the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) by pushing for the party’s “localization,” hoping to compete with homegrown political parties as a pro-Taiwan KMT. However, the present-day members of the KMT do not know what they are talking about, and do not heed the two former presidents’ words, so the party has suffered a third consecutive defeat in the January presidential election. Soon after gaining power with the help of the KMT’s