According to a opinion poll published by the China Times on Sept. 20, the People First Party (PFP) was given a public approval rating of only 25 percent. That was the lowest rating among the four major parties -- the PFP, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU). Even the TSU, although founded after the PFP, received a public approval rating of 31 percent. The DPP ranked first, with 42 percent. The KMT scored a mere 33 percent.
When it comes to the public's preference for candidates to lead the KMT, Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
Taiwanese opinion polls have never been reliable, and results are determined by political outlook. Polls performed by people in the pan-blue camp always predict great victory for the pan-blue camp. The same is true for the pan-green camp. The opinion polls preceding the presidential election earlier this year provide ample evidence of this situation.
The reason why so much importance has been placed on the China Times poll is that it is a blue-camp-leaning newspaper. Prior to the presidential election, all pan-blue-media outlets predicted a major victory for the ticket of KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Soong has recently been very depressed as a result of this opinion poll, in particular as the more or less defunct New Party last week announced that it will participate in the year-end legislative elections under the KMT banner. Some people have attributed Soong's falling popularity to his fondness for political intrigues, and say that the main reason he was punished in the latest poll was that his personal plans have had a negative effect on the KMT-PFP merger.
So, will the KMT and PFP merge? And if they do merge, will Soong be one of the chiefs, or a secondary figure? Is this storm in a teacup in the pan-blue camp nothing more than finding excuses for future defeats? Looking at it from a national perspective, whether the KMT and the PFP merge or not, the flood of rejection that these two parties are facing won't be reversed. The results of the poll simply reflect the mood of society.
Both Lian and Soong are yesterday's news, but neither of them is willing to face up to the reality of their electoral defeat. Lien is still clinging to his position as KMT chairman and refuses to hand over power, and Soong has lost his grasp on public opinion, and continues to promote the PFP as a "Mainlanders" party, stubbornly resisting the formation of a new Taiwanese consciousness.
A person's viability as a politician is not determined by his age. Former president Lee Teng-hui (
It is not impossible for Soong to save himself. He could retire from politics and allow people to forget about him, or he and the PFP could embrace Taiwanese consciousness, for only in this way will the PFP be able to compete on the same foundation as the other parties. If Soong's only ambition is to fight over the votes of the pro-unification fundamentalists, then his political career is close to its end.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS