Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
Public acknowledgement of China's "one China" -- and no Taiwan -- principle violates the basic human rights of the citizens of Taiwan.
Here's an example of how. My Taiwanese friend and her Greek boyfriend were going to get married. But when they went to the municipality where the Greek man resided, the city told them they couldn't get married. Why? Because there was a previous court case where a Taiwanese woman and a Greek man wanted to have a civil marriage, but his parents objected. The parents of the Greek man hired a lawyer to block the marriage. The lawyer used the argument that Taiwan is not a country, and therefore her identification was invalid. The Chinese embassy didn't help either, saying they had no records of Taiwanese citizens.
Ever since then, some cities in Greece just won't marry any Greeks with Taiwanese. All of these couples are educated women and men who met at universities in the UK.
Another example: In the Athens 2004 Olympic Games, the Taiwanese team was bound by the International Olympic Committee's unfair and outdated rules created especially for Taiwan, under pressure from China. Under these rules, although our athletes came from all over Taiwan and not just from Taipei, our team is not called "Taiwan," it is called "Chinese Taipei."
Would the US team like to be called "British Washington DC"? Would the Greek team like to be called "Ottoman Athens?" Taiwan's national pride and dignity was also hampered by the Chinese Taipei flag designed only for the purpose of the Olympic flag-raising. The flag carries the symbol of the party no longer in power in Taiwan, and the Olympic five rings. By the same analogy, would any Greeks like to have their national flag replaced by a flag especially designed for the Olympic Games with symbols of the Pasok party and the Olympic five rings? Any Taiwanese spectators showing their national flag, or carrying signs with "Taiwan" (instead of "Chinese Taipei") risked being thrown out of the games without refunds.
In the spring of last year, SARS, which originated in southern China, killed many in Taiwan. However, the WHO (World Health Organization) didn't send any delegates to help contain the epidemic until the situation was almost out of control. China claims that Taiwan is a province, and that Taiwan's healthcare system is well taken care of by them. Since Taiwan has never been under PRC administration, how can the health care system be taken care of by them?
Yet during their attempt to join the World Health Organization (WHO) -- a bid which was blocked by China -- the delegates from Taiwan were greeted by the Chinese Health Minister with remarks like "Who cares about you, Taiwan?" or "Who pays attention to you?" Taiwan sends many medical personnel to under-developed countries in Africa and Central and South America. But Taiwan's contribution to the world did not help them gain membership in the WHO. Taiwanese people have suffered greatly because of China's campaign to block them from participating in every international organization.
"The Strait that separate us can never cut off bonds of flesh and blood," Wen said. The US was founded by immigrants who left England. By the same analogy, should the US have remained under the control of the British crown because of bonds of flesh and blood?
Aside from the immigrants from China, Taiwan is more multicultural than Wen realizes. Taiwan has 12 Aboriginal tribes whose ancestry is from the Pacific Ocean side, not from China. More recently, there are immigrants from countries such as Indonesia and Vietnam.
Taiwan needs to have its existence recognized in a "normal" way so that the basic human rights of its citizens will not be sacrificed to international politics. In the meantime, Taiwanese hope their neighbor China will soon become a democratic country so that future generations can decide the course of the country. Any threats from China to take Taiwan into its territory by force will only push overseas Taiwanese extremists to become terrorists.
Alison Hsieh
Athens
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS