China's unification tactics are getting increasingly sophisticated. A Ministry of National Defense report revealed that in its desire to achieve unification with Taiwan, China is now targeting the "southern Taiwanese" population using a combination of culture and religion to "improve those people's perspective of China."
The report also pointed out that China was pulling back troops from Dongshan Island, a clear indication that the high-profile military exercises that had been hyped since May were called off. These two pieces of information indicate that China has launched a new strategy in its campaign to unify with Taiwan.
The communist giant is now attempting to get its secondary enemy to destroy its primary enemy. China's greatest enemy is Taiwanese independence, and, at least in the minds of its leaders, democracy and localization are synonymous with independence.
Therefore, its greatest enemies are former president Lee Teng-hui (
For this reason, China originally tried to drive a wedge between the people of Taiwan, and its government. But in 1996, even under the threat of a missile exercise, Lee was elected president, and subsequently in 2000 and 2004, Chen Shui-bian (
Now, China has a new plan in its unification efforts. In the name of cultural and religious integration, it is targeting the people of southern Taiwan, appearing to put aside its belligerent attitude in order to win over their hearts and minds. But as many local officials in the south have pointed out, the consensus is that the future of Taiwan lies in the hands of the majority of Taiwanese people and there is no market for a "Greater China" ideology. If China thinks that by targeting a number of representatives in the south it will be able to makeover its image, then it clearly does not understand the strength of the Taiwan identity among the southern Taiwanese. So, even though China has changed its tactics -- hoping to win over the traditionally "green" and "parochial" southerners -- they are destined to fail.
China's method of luring locals in southern Taiwan over is also useless because the Chinese government still does not understand the true meaning of Taiwan's democracy.
Beijing does not seem to understand that support for unification is dead here. More ridiculously, they seem to believe that pan-green supporters are staunchly pro-independence while pan-blue supporters are staunchly pro-unification.
It is undoubted that a gap between northern and southern Taiwan does exist, as the green camp enjoys strong support in the south, while the blue camp enjoys strong support in the north. But voter support for different political parties are often very different from their positions regarding unification and independence. In fact, we know from past opinion polls that most Taiwanese people desire the maintenance of the status quo in the Taiwan Strait and disagree with China's "one country, two systems" model; while more and more people here consider themselves "Taiwanese," not "Chinese."
Moreover, despite their ideological fighting in the runup to the March presidential election, both the ruling and opposition camps took "loving Taiwan" as the foundation for campaigns. Thus, a local identification has become the mainstream. Voters may support different candidates for various reasons, but their stances regarding unification and independence is not the main factor that affects voting behavior. In other words, supporting Taiwan's democratization and localization is the wish of the majority of Taiwanese people -- except for a group of isolated politicians. Although the Taiwanese people are divided into the green and blue camps during elections, they are actually united when fighting against Chinese hegemony.
To eliminate post-election conflicts, both the ruling and opposition camps have proposed increasing dialogue with each other. The DPP is planning a proposal to resolve issues regarding Taiwan's ethnicity later this month -- with a focus on promoting ethnic diversity and national unity. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) also last month proposed a draft of its new discourse, entitled "a shared local destiny," to strengthen its local identification. Therefore, China's latest united front strategy targeting the southern Taiwanese will never be able to infiltrate and destroy the strong castle of the Taiwanese people's shared destiny.
Thus far, we have been unable to develop positive cross-strait relations and build a win-win situation simply due to China's insistence of annexing Taiwan -- as the former never treats the latter as an equal political entity. No matter how it refines its methods to make them look more attractive, it cannot hide its unificationist ambitions. As such, it is impossible for Beijing to win the Taiwanese people's trust, so its strategies cannot work.
Take China's withdrawal of its military exercise on Dongshan Island for example. If Beijing cannot change its military expansion aimed at Taiwan, the cancelation of a few military exercises is merely an empty gesture, and cross-strait relations will never improve.
The key to improving cross-strait relations lies in whether or not China can treat Taiwan equally, and recognize the country's existence. Notions of eventual unification are an illusion.
Translated by Eddy Chang and Ian Bartholomew
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS