From the "Republic of China" (ROC), which includes China and Mongolia, the "ROC on Taiwan," and even the "ROC is Taiwan," to "Taiwan, ROC" -- officially used by Premier Yu Shyi-kun during his recent three-country Central American tour -- there is no other country like Taiwan, which has constantly proposed new national titles.
These proposals of a national title show that Taiwan is at a historical crossroads, with the nation facing the question of what name can truly represent the country's people while demonstrating its sovereignty. At the opening of this year's Olympic Games, Taiwan's team once again marched into the stadium under the ridiculous name of "Chinese Taipei," proving that the ROC in fact exists in name only.
Taiwan has translated "Chinese Taipei" as "Chunghua [Chinese] Taipei" (
China, as well as the rest of the world, refuses to recognize the name "ROC." Even Taiwan itself is unable to use this name sometimes, although many people in Taiwan are still upholding this empty and useless national title to this day.
After the premier's diplomatic trip, Minister of Foreign Affairs Mark Chen (
Changing Taiwan's national title in order to get rid of the bizarre name of the ROC is the correct approach, considering the reality of the situation and the willingness of the majority of Taiwanese people. Not to mention that the dominant force behind the change comes from Taiwan itself. The key to the issue lies in whether Taiwan's leaders and its people have the courage and confidence to righteously promote the nation in the rest of the world with the help of public support under the name "Taiwan" -- which is already familiar in the international arena, and has been linked to democracy as well as prosperity.
Cao Changqing is a writer based in New York.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of