Under heavy social pressure, the Legislative Yuan passed the constitutional amendment bill on legislative reform in the extra session on Monday. Starting in 2008, the nation will adopt a "single-member district, two-vote system" for legislative elections, and current number of seats in the legislature will be cut from the current 225 to 113.
Despite several hurdles, including the readjustment of electoral constituencies, the result was by no means a watershed in the shaping of the nation's future political landscape or a test of the maturation of Taiwan's political culture.
In theory, the new electoral system is beneficial to larger parties because it creates a "winner-takes-all" effect. Nevertheless, it is too early to say whether it would produce a regular two-party system, because more efforts will have to be made in the follow-up constitutional re-engineering and constituency re-structuring. But it opens a window of opportunity to purify and improve the legislature.
For decades, Taiwan's unique single non-transferable vote system has been a political tumor to the country's democratic pro-cess. It not only breeds the growth of "black gold" politics but also encourages an unhealthy legislative culture. The constant antics and shameless grandstanding have made the Legislative Yuan little more than a political circus full of clowns. The media plays a supplementary role in encouraging such misconduct. Most media reports have played up the antagonism between the ruling and opposition parties. To attract more of the spotlight, it is natural for legislators to seek any kind of media exposure, regardless of the kind of exposure they attract.
These elements contribute to a lack of discipline and efficiency in the Legislative Yuan. Several public opinion polls indicated that people think the legislature is a major source of political instability in this country. Further, the majority of the public also supported the reduction of seats in that arm of government.
Now that legislative revisions have taken place and the electoral system has been reformed, the aim is to expand each legislator's legitimacy. But institutional reform is one thing; how to mold the nation into a mature political culture is another. It constitutes an even more urgent task for the state of politics in this country.
To help make the legislature more transparent, a legitimate and fair civil association composed of experts, academics, media and opinion leaders must be formed to monitor legislators' performance. The media should also refrain from sensationalizing press conferences called by certain legislators who exploit the media or to try to excuse themselves from political wrongdoing. The local press should weigh on its own in the commercial interests and the responsibility to educate the public on what is politically right and wrong.
Finally, as the electorate has become more opinionated and aware, distrust of politicians, parties, and all institutions has become more profound. This underlying shift in the elector-ate's mood will constitute a new demand for public represen-tation. The right to hold referendums should be preserved as a supplementary tool in times of legislative inefficiency.
Further electoral reform is a must. A partisan agreement on the constitutional amendment on electoral rules should be treated as a great step forward for Taiwan's democracy, rather than just a political agreement of partisan interests. Reform-minded political leaders with broad visions for the nation's political development should step out and take the lead, regardless of what the reforms may in turn hurt them in the short term or what party they are affiliated with.
Liu Kuan-teh is a political commentator based in Taipei.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS