In an attempt to jump-start pan-green cooperation, President Chen Shui-bian (
Chen praised the TSU lavishly for its consistent embrace of the nation's mainstream values, for safeguarding Taiwanese identity and for playing a competent role as the "loyal opposition." He called for a joint effort to help the government do a better job and to lead the nation away from constant political wrangling.
Chen's latest message has significant implications. First, it appeals to the pan-green candidates to make the political pie big enough to share, by highlighting the importance of vote distribution among pan-green supporters. It also foresees an inevitable competition between the DPP and the TSU under the current electoral system. But it also holds out hope that both sides can minimize division within the pan-green camp.
Compared to their pan-blue counterparts, pan-green members have a shot at consolidating a majority in the Legislative Yuan. However, the party's contesting election strategies and campaign appeals naturally cause frictions within the camp.
The nation's unique single non-transferable voting system means that candidates compete with contenders from both the opponent parties and their own party. Such rules of the game facilitate intra-party frictions if there is no strict party discipline or coordinated nomination strategy.
The greatest challenge to TSU-DPP collaboration is that the TSU also draws most of its support from southern Taiwan. To broaden their base of support, both the DPP and the TSU must come up with a better designed system of vote allocation.
Moreover, the differences between the DPP and TSU on key issues could affect voters' party affiliation. Being characterized as a more left wing and Taiwan-centered fundamentalist political force, the TSU has made the enacting of a new constitution and a new name for Taiwan its main campaign appeals to the voters. As a smaller party, it is understandable that the TSU will want to develop its own campaign slogan and distinct appeal.
The DPP, on the contrary, has stuck with a more incremental constitutional reengineering process in accordance with the current ROC Constitution -- as outlined by Chen in his inauguration address. In light of the sensitivity of the US-Taiwan-China relationship, the DPP must convince both international and domestic audiences it will take a cautious approach in dealing with constitutional issues.
But can these two parties cooperate with each other on the process of constitutional revision? To what extent can Chen and his party allay concerns -- especially from the US -- that he's not just engaging in a "good cop, bad cop" routine?
Although the DPP has not yet revealed its concrete steps towards constitutional reform, the ruling party will probably incorporate a more moderate method of dealing with constitutional issues. By doing so, it helps the ruling party differentiate its candidates from TSU candidates.
Furthermore, the DPP should utilize its governmental resources and the gradually recovering economy as driving forces to boost its own campaign momentum. The key goals laid out by Chen in his inaugural speech -- the promotion of ethnic harmony, the establishment of peaceful cross-strait relations and the build-up of a mature civil society -- are the fundamentals of the DPP platform.
In order to achieve those goals, better and more detailed techniques of vote distribution should be adopted by the pan-green camp.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS