China's power shortage problem is much more serious this year than last. Most provinces and cities have put limitations on power usage, and even Beijing and Shanghai, the showcases of "socialism with Chinese characteristics," are losing some of their luster.
The power shortages are also affecting foreign investment. Most of China's thermal power plants are fuelled by coal, not oil. But there are production and distribution problems, and coal reserves have already fallen below normal levels.
Taking a long-term perspective, however, the oil crisis poses a more serious threat, because oil has more applications that are closely related to China's future economy and national defense as well as the Chinese people's livelihood.
China is now the world's second largest oil consumer after the US, and imports this year will exceed 100 million tonnes, or about 35 percent of domestic oil consumption. Because state-run enterprises make up the bulk of the Chinese economy, it is pervaded by waste and corruption, which together with China's traditional fondness for grandiose projects and short-term profits leads to a massive waste of resources.
During the annual meetings of the National People's Congress and the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference this year, Niu Yuanwen (牛元文), head of a group researching sustainable development strategies at China's Academy of Sciences, said a large part of China's GDP has been achieved by using methods that sacrifice the
welfare of future generations.
As an example, he said that resources used for the creation of US$1 of GDP are 4.3 times higher than in the US, 7.7 times higher than in Germany, and 11.5 times higher than in Japan.
He also said that China consumes 31 percent of global coal resources, 30 percent of iron ore, 27 percent of steel and 40 percent of cement, but that the resulting GDP is less than four percent of global GDP. China's economic growth will therefore consume
a frightening amount of oil. If China builds a prosperous society for its 1.4 billion citizens, this will demand a huge proportion of global oil reserves.
China has also talked about the necessity of a war in the Taiwan Strait and is preparing for military conflict with the US. Furthermore, China's strategic oil reserves are currently set at 20 days' oil consumption, while reserves in the US and Japan cover 150 days' consumption. China needs to import substantial volumes of oil, and is probably one of the major players behind the soaring oil prices this year, which have now reach US$47 per barrel.
What's more, 60 percent of China's crude oil is imported from the Middle East, which means security over the long shipping routes is a major strategic issue. China is therefore actively developing "oil diplomacy" to find new sources of crude oil.
First, China has set its sights on its former "comrade," Russia, which possesses abundant oil deposits and is geographically convenient for the creation of an oil pipeline between the two countries. China's former leader Jiang Zemin (
Russia, however, has been very cautious and clearly also has its own agenda. As a result, it has hindered China's efforts to buy Russian oil companies and rejected the construction of the Angarsk-Daquing oil pipeline. This has left China with no choice other than to change partners and look instead to the
Republic of Kazakhstan for oil acquisition.
Second, China is also looking to expand its oil imports. In January, President Hu Jintao
(胡錦濤) signed oil agreements while visiting three oil exporting African nations -- Egypt, Gabon and Algeria -- which reveals Beijing's eagerness to resolve its oil crisis.
Third, in order to ensure a safe channel and reduce transportation costs for Middle Eastern oil, China is interested in opening a canal across the Isthmus of Kra in southern Thailand. If a war broke out, the US could easily blockade the Strait of Malacca. And transporting oil through the Isthmus of Kra would reduce shipping distance by more than 1,000km -- which also sparks Japan and South Korea's interest in the new route.
Completing a canal across Thailand will require multilateral negotiations, and it will be difficult to achieve a consensus. As the route would impinge directly on Singapore's and Malaysia's economic interests, they are likely to object.
Then there is the issue of oil exploration. The South China Sea, East China Sea and Yellow Sea are thought to be abundant in oil deposits. In order to explore and develop these oil fields, China has embroiled itself in territorial conflicts regarding the division of economic maritime areas with Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, the Philippines, Indonesia and other countries. Relations with Japan have become more tense, with occasional maritime standoffs that are also related to the cross-strait military standoff.
When dealing with these diplomatic issues, China initially adopted an attitude of uniting Asian countries against "US imperialism." But now, with its soaring economic development, China is gradually showing the impatience of a nascent superpower. This has reduced the anti-imperialism of some Asian countries, who now increasingly "conspire" with the US, and even hope the US can deploy its military in Asia.
This has brought China new diplomatic challenges. This diplomacy is intimately connected with China's economic interests and is a huge challenge for Hu and Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶). Their task is made even more
difficult by Jiang, chairman of the Central Military Commission, whose words and actions have rendered less credible the idea of China's "peaceful rising."
Paul Lin is a commentator based in New York.
Translated by Perry Svennson and Lin Ya-ti
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS