For all practical purposes, internal affairs in most countries have ceased to be purely domestic affairs. Whether we like it or not, one of the consequences of globalization has been the erosion of national sovereignty. In economic matters national boundaries have long ceased to exist.
Also regarding political matters, the traditional notion of sovereignty has been eroded. Today domestic political developments in one state have ceased to be the exclusive domain of that state. The international community, and the big political powers that play leading roles in it, take an active interest in what is happening in other parts of the world. Also in political terms, the world has become interdependent, and interventions have become the rule and not the exception.
YUSHA
This dramatic process is driven also by the proliferation of the international media, foremost the global television channels and, more recently, the Internet. Within seconds, political developments are known in all other parts of the globe. In more than one case, television pictures of gruesome events have forced governments to react -- and intervene. Witness the impact of TV on foreign policy evolving in the case of Sudan. Were it not for the images on CNN, BBC and other media, the public pressure on the governments to intervene and stop the killings would hardly exist.
While globalization is one major trend of our times, the spread of democracy on a global level is another epoch-making development. Recent decades witnessed an unparalleled increase in democratic governance in all major parts of the word. According to Freedom House, a US institute that has monitored the evolution of political and civil liberties on a global level for over 30 years, "the highest-ever proportion of the world's population is living in freedom today."
The proliferation of democracy has many causes, some related to domestic developments, others to international forces. From a liberal angle, human nature and a desire for freedom may be termed the main driving forces behind the quest for democracy throughout the world. Further factors propelling democracy have been the apparent failures of authoritarianism in many countries and the liberating effects of modern information technologies on the minds of millions of people throughout the world.
Apart from these local determinants, the international environment by and large has also been supportive. Democratic governance has become an international benchmark no government wants to ignore. Even notorious dictatorships such as North Korea and Myanmar claim that they are democracies, although there exists a general consensus that so called people's democracies ruled by one monolithic party or the military do not meet the standards of what is generally considered democracy.
The promotion of democracy has become a part of international relations, as most industrialized countries have elaborate programs to promote democratic governance beyond their own borders. By so doing, they inevitably interfere in the political affairs of foreign lands. For more than one reason, this raises serious issues.
I have been actively involved in democracy assistance programs in many parts of the world for more than 10 years. In my eyes, international democracy promotion is justifiable only as long as it is conducted in close cooperation with and upon explicit invitation of relevant political forces of the host society. This promotion of democracy must be limited to legitimate methods and respect the laws of the host country.
A radically new situation has evolved since leading Western governments have turned to military means with the declared aim of promoting democratic values. This "liberal imperialism" has its origin in the late 1990s with the bombing of Serbia, but has reached a high point with the ongoing military occupation of Iraq.
According to the supporters of the military strategy, the ultimate political objective of the war is the democratization of the greater Middle East. For me as a liberal, bonding the words "liberal" and "imperialism" is an unbearable provocation: Liberalism always aims to increase freedom, while imperialism stands for the exact opposite, domination by a foreign power.
I could mention numerous tactical and fundamental arguments why I believe today's Anglo-American "liberal imperialism" in the Middle East is misguided -- and will fail to reach its stated objectives. While, yes, the democratic community of nations (or whatever is left of it following US President George W. Bush's unilateral behavior) cannot sit by idly when gross human rights violations are happening, the selectiveness in the application of the imperial doctrine discredited it even before it was implemented. While US soldiers are killing (and dying) in Iraq for the supposed promotion of democracy, their government has turned a blind eye on -- and is even propping up -- other tyrannies not far away.
It is a fallacy that a democratic society can be established by decree or with guns and cannons.
Democratization of undemocratic societies is a highly complex social, political and cultural process which may take years or even decades, depending on the specific conditions. For democracy to blossom, certain elements are indispensable: pluralism, the evolution of an educated middle class, the emancipation of women, the independence of the judiciary and the presence of independent media.
In other words, the modernization of society is a prerequisite for democratization. Therefore, if governments truly wish to promote democracy in foreign lands (and not their own imperial ambitions) they should first focus their efforts on modernizing said societies.
Otherwise, if they continue to use guns to force their proclaimed democratic principles on other peoples, they might be in for an unpleasant surprise.
If given the chance to express themselves in free elections, the people might end up quite democratically electing the likes of Osama bin Laden and other terrorists into government.
Ronald Meinardus is the resident representative of the Friedrich-Naumann Foundation in the Philippines.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused