On July 28, Chinese financial supervisory agencies made a surprise raid on Taiwanese bank branch offices in China for "illegally attracting business without the necessary licenses." The banks must be condemned for also breaking Taiwanese law by engaging in financial business in China. They are just like rats that, in their greed, bite through a food bag and spill all its contents out on the floor. They have increased the nation's capital outflow. Taiwan's Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) should take action and punish them severely.
Ever since Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
In fact, Taiwan's economy has smoothly been transformed from a handicraft, mechanical and automated industry to the digital age. Taiwan has developed into a leading player in the electronics industry, and is rapidly developing in areas of precision technologies. Taiwan has already won a leading international role as a manufacturer of computers, digital cameras and other advanced products, a clear indication that it has already developed an excellent knowledge-based environment that is ideal for research and development. In addition, development within traditional industries, brand creation and developing sales channels has proved very successful in consolidating traditional industries in Taiwan. Giant, Taiwan's bicycle manufacturer, and La New, a shoe manufacturer, are outstanding examples of this process. It is clear from this that if only the director of the enterprise operates effectively, there is no reason why Taiwanese products cannot be sold all over the world.
Taiwan Thinktank chairman Chen Po-chih (陳博志) said in a recent publication that Taiwan's experience of economic development is similar to that of Switzerland and Finland. Many of the problems those two countries faced were the result of having vastly more powerful neighbors. But as long as they could navigate international trends, and worked hard at upgrading their industries and developing a "knowledge economy," they could still become highly competitive commercial nations with a high standard of living. Taiwan's economic development has never relied on China, and there is no reason why it should start now.
China bedazzled Taiwanese businesses with its cheap land and labor, as well as its vast domestic market. These advantages, however, are disappearing as it moves into a new stage of development. Taiwanese businesspeople cannot safely and steadily promote their business in China due to slack law enforcement and various political factors. Beijing's recent moves to put down "green" businesses provide such an example. Thus, the unexpected management costs are getting higher when investing in China.
The successful stories of many traditional businesses in Taiwan show that restructuring and innovation are key to maintaining a successful business. Since Taiwan has developed a sound investment environment, Taiwanese businesses should follow such a trend, returning to Taiwan like mature salmon returning to their spawning grounds. Placing their priority in upgrading their businesses, they should beware of being misled by malicious banks and digging a hole from which they can not escape.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the