Government officials and members of the press accompanied President Chen Shui-bian (
The nation has been conducting the Han Kuang annual military exercises since the middle of this month. Many of the exercises occur every year and are little noted. By contrast, attention-grabbing drills such as the simulated emergency jet landings on the highways -- the first of their kind in over 20 years -- have captured the public's imagination and been widely reported in the press. This latest exercise, with the president going out to sea on board a submarine, is one such attention-grabbing event.
These novel exercises have sparked a public discussion on national security. This offers the country another opportunity to debate the need for military purchases. It also offers a chance to discuss the multi-billion dollar military-purchase budget, which is stalled in the legislature as a result of the stand-off between the governing and opposition parties.
The strategic thinking of the nation's military is focused on keeping a decisive battle in the Strait. Far from being an aimless waste of funds, the purchase of anti-missile and anti-submarine arms and equipment therefore fills a crucial need. Currently, a scarcity of funds and the government's inability to persuade the opposition parties and the general public are preventing passage of this critical budget appropriation.
Under Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) rule, big military purchases resembled black holes. It was hard for the public to know what was going on. Even in the government, only a few people had a full grasp of the situation. Because of this lack of transparency, national funds were mixed up with private funds, and huge amounts of taxpayers' hard-earned money found their way into the pockets of vested interests.
What's more, the military-purchase budget has become a tool in the development of a pragmatic diplomacy. The government is exchanging arms purchases for international visits by top level officials and the development of diplomatic space.
The stalling economy has also meant that the government's tax income is falling precisely when military expenditures should be increased. This has led to public concern that spending on social welfare and infrastructure development will be curtailed.
To win approval for its multi-billion dollar budget allocation, Chen has gotten personally involved. He emphasized that both the government and the opposition should work together to approve this budgetary allocation. To help achieve this, Chen has even taken a ride in a submarine, a clear indication of the urgency with which the government views this issue.
National security should not be sacrificed to the standoff between the pan-blue and pan-green camps. Neither should the government view all the criticisms made by the opposition as malign obstructionism. We hope that the government will work hard to win public support for this NT$610 billion (US$18.2 billion) budgetary allocation for the military by addressing concerns of where the money will come from, its impact on other spending and the transparency of the purchasing process.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS