Ever since 2000, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party (PFP) have been unable to accept the fact that Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was elected president. Since he won with just 40 percent of the vote, they focused on the fact that KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) had together won more votes. In this way they denied losing the election. This was a warning of the anti-democratic mania that has continued to affect them.
For example, when it rained during a pan-blue protest outside the Presidential Office after Chen was re-elected, claims were made that Chen had asked the Air Force to dump water from above. They said the assassination attempt on Chen the day before the election was staged by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
In the areas where the DPP vote count was high, there was also a higher proportion of invalid ballots. This should mean that many DPP supporters lost the opportunity to vote for their party. But the pan-blue camp found someone at the Academia Sinica to say that the high number of invalid ballots was incontrovertible proof of vote-fixing.
This verges on hysteria. And when transmitted through the media, it has forced Taiwanese society into a state of intellectual paralysis. (Even forensic scientist Henry Lee's report, in which the pan-blue camp had put so much faith, was rejected because it was "intellectually impartial.") Now the pan-blue camp has, with the assistance of numerous retired diplomats, published a pamphlet titled Bulletgate, which it used to air its paranoid suspicions to the Americans.
This is a scene worthy of One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. No wonder that former DPP chairman Hsu Hsin-liang (
There are other examples. One pro-unification newspaper had as a front-page headline: "Three DPP heavyweights take NT$30 million in bribes." That news proved to be false. Another paper reported that the Ministry of Finance would introduce a capital gains tax for the stock market. The news caused a drop in stock prices before it was also proved false.
A PFP legislator made accusations about government subsidies of NT$1.84 million for a building called the "President's Official Residence." Later it came to light that the subsidy was perfectly legitimate and was earmarked for an apartment building in Nantou named "President's Official Residence" that had been damaged in an earthquake. Now that over 70 percent of public expression is controlled by such "journalists," there will be few quiet days.
Opponents of democracy will come and go, but the pro-unification media is always there to do their work. Why is this? The media is a privileged field dominated by a small number of families -- and the media reject the idea of Taiwanese being in control of Taiwan. Although there is now plenty of talk about media freedom, a large portion of the media still consist of these same people and they continue to maintain the "old order."
Former president Lee Teng-hui (
Lao Pao is a political commentator.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS