KMT misses another chance
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) missed an opportunity to come to terms with its past. It complained that the scheduled legislative election date of Dec. 11, one day after the 25th anniversary of the Kaohsiung Incident, was politically motivated to benefit the Democratic Progressive Party and harms the chances of its legislative candidates.
Therefore, it urged that the day be changed to the traditional last Saturday of November or first Saturday of December. The complaint itself is a self-fulfilling prophesy. Raising the issue focused voters' attention on the KMT's past persecution of democracy advocates, and thereby reminded voters of its unsavory past.
In this sense, the KMT and its candidates are already prejudiced. Instead of focusing on winning the election by crying foul, the KMT should use the anniversary to come clean by admitting its past mistakes while taking the initiative to disclose the truth about the White Terror era and the 228 Incident.
A willingness to confront its past, to ask voters for forgiveness and to reconcile with its past will help it win votes. Bickering won't. Objecting to the election date reflects a guilty conscience and a conscious effort to avoid past mistakes. Until the KMT understands why it has lost credibility with voters and the party takes positive steps to earn voters' trust, control of the government will remain out of its reach.
Kenneth Choy
Hong Kong
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS