Over the past six months, China has been continuously advocating its new "peaceful rise" position. But no matter how we look at it, a more suitable name to describe this process would be "rise by terror."
This "peaceful rise" idea was proposed for the first time in Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao's (溫家寶) speech on Dec. 10 last year during a speech at Harvard University. "China today is a country undergoing reform and opening-up and a is rising power dedicated to peace," Wen was quoted as saying in the Harvard Gazette.
In a symposium to commemorate the 110th anniversary of Mao Zedong's (
Obviously, these lies are intended to deny the threats China poses to Taiwan. China's "peaceful rise" notion was crafted by the 11th Party Congress central committee and will continue until the middle of this century, when its basic modernization goals are achieved. But despite all the rhetoric, there has only been terror. For example:
Just two months after the Party Congress, China declared a war of "self-defense" against Vietnam, fighting its way to Lang Son before pulling back. This was done to threaten neighboring countries and to oust Hua Kuo-feng (華國鋒), who was chairman of the Central Military Commission.
On June 4, 1989, the government surrounded the capital with troops to crush peaceful protests in Tiananmen Square. Zhao Zi-yang (趙紫陽), then party general secretary, was incarcerated.
In July 1999, the government cracked down on the Falun Gong movement. Many people have died from the persecution and many more have been incarcerated. This crackdown, along with that of other dissident groups, has been done in the name of maintaining stability.
Even China's economic development is fraught with violence. Chinese government officials in every region work with transnational corporations and Chinese "entrepreneurs" to exploit Chinese workers. Recently, US Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao (趙小蘭) signed four joint letters of understanding with China to improve workplace safety and protect workers' rights. That such actions required foreign intervention gives us an idea of the terror ingrained in China's economic development.
Since 1995, Beijing has constantly threatened Taiwan with invasion and frequently holds military exercises along the coast of Fujian Province. It has even test fired-missiles towards the country. Threatening language is commonly employed in reference to Taiwan among Chinese officials and their media. High-ranking military officials have also threatened nuclear strikes against Los Angeles or against dams in the US as part of an "unlimited war" strategy. As communications in China's media are strictly monitored, it can only be assumed that these views are at least tacitly accepted. All this is simply government-sponsored terrorism.
The Straits Times daily in Singapore, in a recent report, said that some members of the National People's Congress and other party officials sent a letter to the central government suggesting that if Taiwan ever intended to threaten the Three Gorges Dam, they should revoke their guarantee of not using nuclear weapons against Taiwan in the event of war.
Note the use of the word "intended." It only requires Bei-jing to judge Taiwan's intentions for it to go back on its international commitments not to use their nuclear capabilities in a first strike. It is widely known that the National People's Congress cannot oppose government decisions, so their suggestions are crafted to coincide with the wishes of their superiors -- or as a "nuclear bluff" game at the least. This is the behavior of a rogue state.
Whether internationally or domestically, China uses the tactics of terror to reinforce its power. This by any other name is still the rise of terror.
Paul Lin is a commentator based in New York.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti and Ian Bartholomew
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the