In recent times, the Chiang family has acted as an umbilical cord connecting Taiwan and China, and the bodies of former presidents General Chiang Kai-shek (
The decision for the two Chiangs to be laid to rest in Taiwan represents the fact that the political force that arrived in Taiwan from China has given up its dream of "retaking the mainland."
Prior to 1949, the fascist Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) led by Chiang Kai-shek, plagued with internal corruption, lost the support of the Chinese people. Their defeat at the hands of the Communists forced them to flee to Taiwan. In Taiwan, Chiang Kai-shek resumed his strong-man tactics and maintained martial law, in the course of which countless lives were sacrificed during the 228 incident and the period of "White Terror." Both Chiang Kai-shek and his son, Chiang Ching-kuo, viewed Taiwan as merely a base of operations, a springboard from which to return to China. As a result, they gave little thought to the long-term construction of Taiwan or the welfare of its people.
When the US-ROC Mutual Defense Treaty was signed in 1954, it was clear that the Chiang family no longer believed that there was any hope of retaking China, so this idea became a tool for them to maintain their monopoly on political power.
Only during his later years in power did Chiang Ching-kuo realize that the KMT, an alien power in Taiwan, would never return to China, and if he did not move towards localization, the KMT would have no place left to go. He therefore promoted people from the local elite to let Taiwanese people rule Taiwan, and tolerated the democratization and liberalization of Taiwan. The KMT's political localization was meant to maintain the KMT's political power and turn Taiwan into a base for opposing Beijing.
This move showed that he was already preparing to remain in Taiwan. In addition, he often travelled to different areas in Taiwan in his later years, building an image of being close to the people. He even said that "I am also Taiwanese," and to a certain degree developed emotional bonds with Taiwan.
Returning to the place of one's birth to die is a custom among Chinese people. So although there are many in Taiwan who still harbor a hatred of the Chiang family, there are many others who respect them and find the idea of their burial in Taiwan more congenial than to be returned to a China they regard as an enemy and whose intentions are uncertain.
Madam Chiang Kai-shek, who represents the first generation who moved to Taiwan, has now passed away, and the Chiang family no longer has the responsibility or the duty to bring the KMT back to power in China. Faina Chiang Fang-liang has decided that it is in the interests of the Chiang family that the two Chiangs should now be buried in Taiwan and end the rootlessness of the Chiang family since they moved from China. Now that the family's roots have been planted in Taiwan, Chiang Ching-kuo's claim that he "is also Taiwanese" can finally be said with a clear conscience.
The establishment of the Chiang family roots in Taiwan will also resolve many of the contradictions in the self-identification of the Mainlanders who came over with them. The burial will help them to accept the reality that they have long since become Taiwanese, and this in turn will help resolve the issue of Taiwan's own identity.
Now that the two Chiangs will be buried in Taiwan, the KMT will also have to think clearly about whether they are the Chinese Nationalist Party or the "Taiwan Nationalist Party."
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS