Gradually, with hardly anyone noticing, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) has emerged as the most influential player in the volatile triangle of relations between China, the US and his own nation.
The reason: The Chinese are stuck with a rigid "one China" policy that shows no inkling of imagination or flexibility and the Americans are paying only sporadic attention, hoping that the issue will somehow go away. That leaves Chen latitude to maneuver between them.
Even so, the chances of a miscalculation by Chen -- or the Chinese or the Americans -- continues to make the future of Taiwan the most dangerous long-term confrontation in Asia.
The standoff begins with Bei-jing's relentless claim that Taiwan is a province of China, and its insistence that the Taiwanese accept that demand. The Chinese have repeatedly threatened to use military force to conquer Taiwan if the Taiwanese declare independence or delay unification.
Beijing seems to realize that attacking Taiwan would incur devastating economic losses. And China's military leaders, after years of brushing off the US commitment to help defend Taiwan, have evidently begun to realize the potential US military role in the defense of Taiwan.
In Washington, the Bush administration, preoccupied with Iraq and Afghanistan and the war on terror, has no long-range objective in its China or Taiwan policy. In recent weeks, President George W. Bush has concentrated on patching up relations with traditional allies and running for re-election. Nonetheless, US military officers have quietly expanded their contacts with Taiwan's armed forces, sending observers to Taiwanese war games to learn their strengths and weaknesses and how US and Taiwanese forces might mesh their operations in the event of cross-strait hostilities.
The US officers have also continued to have limited contact with Chinese officers in an effort to deter them. In a private exchange, a senior Chinese officer harangued his American counterpart about how Beijing would brook no foreign interference on the issue of Taiwan. To which the American replied, dryly: "In the Pacific, we own the sky and we own the water," meaning air and naval supremacy, "so let's talk about something else."
In this precarious equation, Chen has been building a consensus at home intended to sustain Taiwan's continued separation from the mainland without a declaration of independence.
In Beijing, the new regime led by President Hu Jintao (
Hu is further hemmed in because hostilities with Taiwan and the US would severely damage the trade and foreign investment vital to a China with 300 million unemployed or underemployed people -- 40 percent of the labor force. Last year, China exported US$152 billion worth of goods to the US, its biggest export market.
The Bloomberg news agency reported that China has accumulated US$527 billion in foreign investment and has another US$1 trillion contracted. The US, Japan and Taiwan are the largest foreign investors in China -- and that would disappear in a war.
Several years ago, many Chinese asserted that the US would not defend Taiwan. That notion has changed; as the US Defense Department said recently: "Beijing sees Washington as the principal hurdle to any attempt to use military force to regain Taiwan."
Robert Sutter of Georgetown University agrees: "The US is seen by Chinese officials as the dominant power in Asian and world affairs, and the main potential international danger to confront and complicate China's development and rising power and influence."
Richard Halloran is a Hawaii-based journalist.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of