In recent years, arms procurement has been the subject of a lot of controversy. The controversy -- much of it originating in the Legislative Yuan, which is in charge of approving procurement budgets -- has centered on the necessity of weapons systems, the price of those systems and the potential for corruption.
A 15-member legislative delegation headed by Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
How to strike a balance between among various legitimate concerns is a very challenging task. But, in trying to accomplish this difficult task, it is imperative to keep in mind Taiwan's unique circumstances -- circumstances that complicate an issue that is controversial even in other countries.
It is no exaggeration to say that the nation is in dire need of certain weapons systems, especially considering the enormous threat from China and the imbalance in military power between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. No wonder the US has repeatedly expressed its concern about the situation.
Lee Wen-chung (
Unfortunately, despite serious threats, many opposition legislators have continued to accuse the government of engaging in an arms race with China. Given the nation's current situation, it is in fact laughable to depict the situation as an "arms race." Taiwan is only allowed to purchase defensive arms from the US under the Taiwan Relations Act, while China faces no such prohibition and has not even bothered to conceal its intention to become a military superpower on a par with the US. With the two sides on such a completely unequal footing, how can there possibly be an arms race between China and Taiwan?
It is difficult to understand how so many people can overlook the need to enhance the nation's defense capabilities, preferring to depend instead on the US to come to the nation's aid in a timely manner.
There are two obvious problems with this position. One, in the event of a Chinese attack, Taiwan would need to have a sufficient defense capability to hold off the Chinese until the US could make its power felt; and two, defending one's country is a sacred responsibility and it is irresponsible, not to say contemptible, to depend on other countries to do it instead.
Unfortunately, despite the nation's need for arms to help it defend itself, Taiwan has access to very limited channels through which it can purchase weapons. This of course has much to do with China's threatening and coercing other countries to not sell arms to Taiwan. The US is virtually the only country willing and able to ignore China's pressure.
Between the US and Taiwan, this creates an imbalance in supply and demand, so it is hardly surprising that the US isn't exactly handing out bargains.
On the other hand, this does not mean that the sky is the limit as far as prices are concerned. Therefore, all efforts to get the best value for money under these unusual circumstances -- including efforts by the Legislative Yuan -- ought to be appreciated. After all, it is the people's money that is at stake here.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS