In recent years, arms procurement has been the subject of a lot of controversy. The controversy -- much of it originating in the Legislative Yuan, which is in charge of approving procurement budgets -- has centered on the necessity of weapons systems, the price of those systems and the potential for corruption.
A 15-member legislative delegation headed by Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
How to strike a balance between among various legitimate concerns is a very challenging task. But, in trying to accomplish this difficult task, it is imperative to keep in mind Taiwan's unique circumstances -- circumstances that complicate an issue that is controversial even in other countries.
It is no exaggeration to say that the nation is in dire need of certain weapons systems, especially considering the enormous threat from China and the imbalance in military power between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. No wonder the US has repeatedly expressed its concern about the situation.
Lee Wen-chung (
Unfortunately, despite serious threats, many opposition legislators have continued to accuse the government of engaging in an arms race with China. Given the nation's current situation, it is in fact laughable to depict the situation as an "arms race." Taiwan is only allowed to purchase defensive arms from the US under the Taiwan Relations Act, while China faces no such prohibition and has not even bothered to conceal its intention to become a military superpower on a par with the US. With the two sides on such a completely unequal footing, how can there possibly be an arms race between China and Taiwan?
It is difficult to understand how so many people can overlook the need to enhance the nation's defense capabilities, preferring to depend instead on the US to come to the nation's aid in a timely manner.
There are two obvious problems with this position. One, in the event of a Chinese attack, Taiwan would need to have a sufficient defense capability to hold off the Chinese until the US could make its power felt; and two, defending one's country is a sacred responsibility and it is irresponsible, not to say contemptible, to depend on other countries to do it instead.
Unfortunately, despite the nation's need for arms to help it defend itself, Taiwan has access to very limited channels through which it can purchase weapons. This of course has much to do with China's threatening and coercing other countries to not sell arms to Taiwan. The US is virtually the only country willing and able to ignore China's pressure.
Between the US and Taiwan, this creates an imbalance in supply and demand, so it is hardly surprising that the US isn't exactly handing out bargains.
On the other hand, this does not mean that the sky is the limit as far as prices are concerned. Therefore, all efforts to get the best value for money under these unusual circumstances -- including efforts by the Legislative Yuan -- ought to be appreciated. After all, it is the people's money that is at stake here.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS