We are happy to hear that the US government is reviewing its "one China" policy, which has remained unchanged for more than 20 years. Although the scope of the review is very limited, according to US scholar John Tkacik, and the chance for any major breakthrough is slight, a small step toward changing this policy is still a giant historical leap.
According to Tkacik, US foreign policy cannot be built on a myth. Statements by Assistant Secretary of State James Kelly before the US Congress reveal that people are beginning to recognize that the "one China" policy is ever less relevant to the actual cross-strait relationship.
Even a tourist without the slightest understanding of the Taiwan-China relationship will see the differences: he will have to go to the Taiwanese mission to apply for a visa, not to the Chinese embassy; he will be making purchases with NT dollars in Taiwan, not yuan; he will find that although the official language is Mandarin in both locations, Taiwan uses a traditional script, and not China's simplified characters.
If this visitor stays longer, he will find out that Taiwan is a democratic country where a member of the opposition party can refuse to recognize the government without going to jail, and that this country has its own laws and armed forces.
The situation revealed by this is that Taiwan has been a "quasi-state" for over half a century. Most of its residents are in fact immigrants from China. They inherited Chinese culture and have built a society of their own on the shoulders of the Chinese culture, and have been very proud of this achievement.
Therefore, if we want to portray the current cross-strait situation with a more precise concept, it should be the "one Chunghua" or "one Chinese" idea proposed by Vice President Annette Lu (
"Chunghua" is a cultural concept and expresses the fact that Taiwan has inherited and continues to develop a Chinese culture. This shared cultural foundation provides an opportunity for strengthening and improving relations between Taiwan and China.
In the four years of the president's first term, specifically since his 2000 inauguration speech, cross-strait relations didn't go anywhere because of China's intransigence. Since Chen won a second term, things have become worse, with China instigating hostile actions, including threats against the Chi Mei Group (
This is possibly the most hopeless the cross-strait situation has ever been. Part of the reason is that pro-green people in Taiwan have always been reluctant to admit and be proud of their Chinese heritage, creating the impression around the world that pro-greens are unfriendly toward China. Another reason is China's refusal to face the transformations of Taiwan's society.
Those who govern should be more sensitive to the times than ordinary people if they are to look ahead and plan policy. People who have this sensitivity and foresight are called statesmen. We need someone to terminate the hopelessness of the present cross-strait situation.
It is best if the US, China and Taiwan work together, but the key is for a child unafraid to speak the truth to point out that "The emperor is not wearing any clothes!" It needs to be pointed out that "one China" is simply a lie.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS