We are happy to hear that the US government is reviewing its "one China" policy, which has remained unchanged for more than 20 years. Although the scope of the review is very limited, according to US scholar John Tkacik, and the chance for any major breakthrough is slight, a small step toward changing this policy is still a giant historical leap.
According to Tkacik, US foreign policy cannot be built on a myth. Statements by Assistant Secretary of State James Kelly before the US Congress reveal that people are beginning to recognize that the "one China" policy is ever less relevant to the actual cross-strait relationship.
Even a tourist without the slightest understanding of the Taiwan-China relationship will see the differences: he will have to go to the Taiwanese mission to apply for a visa, not to the Chinese embassy; he will be making purchases with NT dollars in Taiwan, not yuan; he will find that although the official language is Mandarin in both locations, Taiwan uses a traditional script, and not China's simplified characters.
If this visitor stays longer, he will find out that Taiwan is a democratic country where a member of the opposition party can refuse to recognize the government without going to jail, and that this country has its own laws and armed forces.
The situation revealed by this is that Taiwan has been a "quasi-state" for over half a century. Most of its residents are in fact immigrants from China. They inherited Chinese culture and have built a society of their own on the shoulders of the Chinese culture, and have been very proud of this achievement.
Therefore, if we want to portray the current cross-strait situation with a more precise concept, it should be the "one Chunghua" or "one Chinese" idea proposed by Vice President Annette Lu (
"Chunghua" is a cultural concept and expresses the fact that Taiwan has inherited and continues to develop a Chinese culture. This shared cultural foundation provides an opportunity for strengthening and improving relations between Taiwan and China.
In the four years of the president's first term, specifically since his 2000 inauguration speech, cross-strait relations didn't go anywhere because of China's intransigence. Since Chen won a second term, things have become worse, with China instigating hostile actions, including threats against the Chi Mei Group (
This is possibly the most hopeless the cross-strait situation has ever been. Part of the reason is that pro-green people in Taiwan have always been reluctant to admit and be proud of their Chinese heritage, creating the impression around the world that pro-greens are unfriendly toward China. Another reason is China's refusal to face the transformations of Taiwan's society.
Those who govern should be more sensitive to the times than ordinary people if they are to look ahead and plan policy. People who have this sensitivity and foresight are called statesmen. We need someone to terminate the hopelessness of the present cross-strait situation.
It is best if the US, China and Taiwan work together, but the key is for a child unafraid to speak the truth to point out that "The emperor is not wearing any clothes!" It needs to be pointed out that "one China" is simply a lie.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS