Since the March election we have become used to interpreting everything the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) says through the filter of Orwellian 1984-style doublespeak -- "war is peace," that sort of thing.
Take KMT Chairman Lien Chan's (
This "don't read my lips" interpretation has recently had heavy usage. For example, readers might remember how in the election's immediate aftermath the riots were predictably called "peaceful protests" by "dissatisfied voters" who actually were blue rent-a-mobs.
We were told that it was of the utmost urgency to speed the recount, so urgent that declaration of a state of emergency was suggested. What this was shown to mean was that the pan-blues would try every gambit they could find to drag their feet on getting the recount under way, even down to the world's richest political party saying it could not afford the NT$60 million bond it had to hand over to the court to make sure it wouldn't default on the case's cost if it were required to pay.
We were told that the pan-blues were only interested in fairness, meaning that they were not interested in fairness but only in making sure that their patrician "right to rule" went unchallenged by the democratic hoi polloi. We were told they wanted to "get to the truth" of the March 19 shooting, only to find out quite clearly that this meant "to believe any wacky conspiracy theory, even in the face of the evidence provided by the specialist whom we ourselves insisted investigate the case."
KMT doublespeak reached its apogee at the inaug-uration. The slogan, remember, was "Taiwan, we continue to move forward," which really meant "We want to go back to the Chiang family dictatorship." In his speech at the pan-blue rally that day, Lien told supporters: "What we care about here is not winning or losing, but about right and wrong," which in Lien-speak means his right to be president and the wrong of anybody else's having the job.
Lien also said he would work to integrate the pan-blues "as one big family," which means that by merging the KMT with the People First Party (PFP) he could keep his job by plying on the widespread loathing in the KMT for the man who would take over if he were toppled: PFP Chairman James "Chung-hsing Bills" Soong (宋「興票」楚瑜). And we were told that the pan-blue meeting was a spontaneous rally of supporters, and of course found that many KMT members only attended because they were ordered to.
So far the "understand the opposite of what is said"tactic has served us well. Even on Saturday, as the party claimed that it had no intention of trying to kick out pro-localization members, we understood that this was exactly what Lien and the KMT leadership had in mind, egged on by the anti-localization PFP.
How then are we to interpret Saturday's remarks by spokeswoman Kuo Su-chun (
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS