While the opposition is still obsessed with de-legitimizing President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) presidential election victory, Chen and his ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have their eyes on the year-end legislative election. In the past couple of weeks, Chen launched a series of decisive moves with an aim to lay a solid foundation for DPP rule.
Chen first started a transition of power by introducing new party elites into the Cabinet reshuffle. With new blood injected into the government structure, Chen successfully opened an arena for cultivating party elites.
His second step was to activate a strategy for DPP nomination rules and stepping up cooperation with the DPP's partner, the Taiwan Solidarity Union, to make sure the pan-green force could secure a majority in the next Legislative Yuan. A de facto majority will pave the way for Chen's implementation of reforms and clear the obstructionism from the pan-blue opposition force.
Chen's rejuvenation of his own party and his determination to gain another victory in the national legislature will greatly influence Taiwan's political landscape and the potential party realignment.
In his first term, Chen was virtually handicapped by the pan-blue opposition. After his hard-won re-election and an emerging power struggle within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), Chen is in an even better position in terms of enlarging his support base.
Having won a majority vote in the presidential election, Chen must strengthen his ties with the opposition party..
So how would Chen reach across the lines to the legislators of the opposition party? The old way was through pork and patronage. These techniques might still work if the Chen administration could accelerate its sale of the New Ten Construction Projects to local governments. With pressure from the rank and file to improve regional development, opposition legislators would not dare to block the government's proposal.
Another strategy is to appeal to ideological sentiment. While ideology always plays a role in how legislators behave, most are more interested in achieving something, getting re-elected and moving ahead. Some KMT legislators from the south have been complaining about their party's failure to embrace the mainstream "Taiwanese consciousness" during the presidential election. If they were to compete with candidates from the pan-green camp, they would have no choice but to echo Chen's ideo-logy of "Taiwan first."
Chen must act like a political consultant or advisor to the legislators on the other side of the partisan divide. He needs to educate them on the likely gains they will score if they cross party lines on a particular vote. He needs to explain to legislators of the opposition parties why his views make sense in the electoral arithmetic of his district.
But beyond political opportunism and self-interest lies an even more potent appeal: power-sharing. A party realignment in Taiwan after the December election is highly likely. To create an image as a "bargaining president," Chen should incorporate elites from the opposition camp into the government.
When the executive opens his doors and lets a member of the other party into the decision-making councils, it leaves more incentives for opposition legislators to defect to the DPP. In real politics, few people can resist the temptation or the appeal of relevance and power.
As the KMT leadership still resists the internal call for a power transition and democratic decision-making, it opens a gate for party realignment in Taiwanese politics in the near future.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS