After reading your article about The Washington Post's interview with President Chen Shui-bian (
A possible explanation could be that many people are against change in this country and abroad.
They fear that any change to the status quo whether in the form of improving Taiwan's democracy or economic development through enhancing our laws would imply taking the road of independence.
It is not the case that making Taiwan a better place means Chen is seeking officially to declare an independent Taiwan in the future through changing the Constitution.
I have analyzed Chen's interview with The Washington Post. There is nothing in the article that suggests Chen wants to declare independence for Taiwan.
Instead, Chen has clearly stated that he wants to make Taiwan more democratic and to reform the political system.
The people of Taiwan should not be afraid of reform but should rather embrace it because reform would only make Taiwan more competitive economically and more stable politically in the future.
We should also remember that Taiwan is not the only country seeking reform.
France has just undergone regional elections and reform has been an important issue.
In addition, international organizations have been promoting regulatory reform among their members. The existence of good laws and regulations strengthens a country's economic development.
Therefore, we must not be suspicious of Chen's actions to improve our democratic system and Constitution, but should rather give our fullest support so that the reform could be accomplished leading to the advancement of Taiwan's economy and political system.
As a suggestion, perhaps our government should put more effort into explaining Chen's views of Taiwan's future to the people.
Ho Chen-sheng
Taipei
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the