As the agitation following in the wake of the presidential election is subsiding, the pan-blue camp, which still hasn't conceded defeat, has demanded a full recount of the vote, the establishment of an independent committee to investigate the assassination attempt on President Chen Shui-bian (
Dr. Henry Lee (
It's widely believed that the outcome of a recount may be disadvantageous to the pan-blue camp and they appear to be aware of this. As a result, before Chen announced last Saturday that he agreed to a recount as soon as possible, the pan-blue camp had already changed its demand for an instant recount. It had first demanded a re-election. But after the public responded negatively to the idea, the pan-blues switched their stance by saying that a re-election was not their true intention. They said that the results of a recount would be insufficient for them to admit defeat.
The pan-blues' methods are hardly a show of their sincerity about resolving the election dispute. No wonder their credibility is being increasingly questioned by the outside world, even as they convey the impression that Taiwan is mired in disorder.
As for the questions about the national security mechanism, these are a red herring. Discussion of the matter will be meaningless if experts can prove that the shooting was not planned by Chen himself.
The reason for this is that it is only appropriate to trigger the mechanism when a president and/or a vice president have been injured. National security is paramount. In this light, whether the military and police personnel are allowed to vote should not be the question at all.
If the assassination attempt turns out to have been a fake, however, then the discussion on this matter is even more irrelevant. If this were the case, Chen and Lu would have to step down and apologize.
However, a greater worry is that both the pan-blue and the pan-green camps, knowing that the result is unlikely to be overturned, might resort to manufacturing confusing questions to mislead the public and creating social conflict in a nod to the December legislative elections. The goal would be to court middle-of-the-road voters supporting the pan-blue camp and to pave the road to power for some politicians. If partisan interests blind people's judgement, then the nation's democratic development is heading toward a cul-de-sac. The truth behind the assassination attempt, rather than an extension of political confrontation, is what the people want.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS