The Pequod is going down, and going down fast.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Their "unfair election" misadventure is a desperate ploy to save their careers and their reputations, and they are not afraid to take everyone down with them.
Any pan-blue politician worth his salt will cut himself loose from the wreckage of the Lien-Soong campaign and seek a new vessel to carry his political aspirations.
The younger generation of pan-blue leaders has to make a choice between tying their future to the waning fortunes of the old guard of the pan-blue camp and charting a new course of reconciliation and constructive criticism.
There is no reason the pan-blues cannot, over the next four years, embrace the role of opposition party and thereby strengthen the political debate in Taiwan.
Were the pan-blues to play their cards right, they would also have a groundswell of support to tap into for the December legislative elections.
But why should anyone want a revived pan-blue camp?
Because democracy requires nuanced and spirited debate. No government is infallible, and no political party can know what is best for everyone on every issue (although many claim that they do).
If Taiwan's opposition party sinks into a morass of self-pity and unthinking contrariness, how will the people of Taiwan resolve any of the lasting problems they must face?
There has been a lot of poor sportsmanship all around. The nation is divided about how to proceed socially, economically and diplomatically.
This, at least, must be recognized by both political alliances.
The divisive and acrimonious tactics of the past should be set aside.
The pan-blues have learned that these are the components of a losing strategy, having lost credibility and two presidential elections.
The alliance has capable, popular and honest politicians. Such leaders should recognize the opportunity they now have to take control of their party and chart a new political course.
The problems facing Taiwan -- how to resolve the cross-strait dispute, how to strengthen and nurture the economy, how to clean up the environmental disaster left by decades of neglect, among others -- are impervious to quick fixes and catchy slogans.
If the debate over these issues degenerates into mere barroom brawling in the legislature, who in Taiwan will benefit?
Ahab never got his whale, and Lien and Soong aren't going to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat.
All of the desperate efforts they have used to fan the flames of anger surrounding their defeat won't make any difference.
They have tried all of the legal solutions available.
They have whimpered, whined, begged and thundered for a new election, a new recount -- anything to give them victory. But it is to no avail.
Lien has gotten his recount, but this is not Florida, and the vote-tallying process is both swift and accurate. Besides, the pan-blues smeared the entire election as "unfair," but they never alleged impropriety in the initial tally of ballots. It is improbable that a recount will alter the final result of the election, and Lien knows it. Hence the theatrics.
So let the old KMT -- the corrupt, authoritarian and ruthless KMT -- die the spectacular death it deserves.
Send Lien and Soong packing.
Mac William Bishop is an editor at the Taipei Times.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS