The post-election political protests initiated by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
The entire political fiasco created by the pan-blue camp is a disgrace to the nation's hard-won democracy -- but an even bigger public-relations disaster for the KMT. Lien's narrow-mindedness in pursuing the invalidation of the election and his lust for power not only have undermined the legitimacy of his call for a recount but also have wounded the pan-blue alliance. Society would have begun healing the divisions caused by the election campaign if it weren't for Lien's refusal to recognize that he led his party to a second-straight presidential-election loss.
Given Chen's razor-thin margin of victory, it is understandable that Lien supporters would want to voice their dissatisfaction. But the key is how to translate this public dissatisfaction into a driving force for the pan-blue camp. The close race between US President George W. Bush and former vice president Al Gore in the US presidential 2000 election is a classic example of how democratic values can be treasured.
After a month-long recount in Florida and the Supreme Court's rejection of his petition, Gore's concession speech called upon Americans to heal the divisions of the campaign. Gore extended his support to Bush by saying that "partisan feeling must yield to patriotism ... what remains of partisan rancor must now be put aside and may God bless his stewardship of this country."
Gore's timely statement saved the American people from endless political maneuvering and a potentially empty power center. Neither he nor Bush anticipated any political turmoil. Both of them understood that their differences had to be resolved through the honored institutions of the US' democracy.
Compare Gore's words and actions with those of Lien. Gore strongly disagreed with the Supreme Court's decision, but he accepted it for the sake of the American people and the strength of American democracy. Lien first filed a lawsuit asking for a recount, but failed to provide any concrete evidence of vote-rigging. Then he questioned the validity of the election and called for a new one -- even before the Taiwan High Court threw out his first suit.
Each time Lien has been offered what he has demanded -- a recount and a broader investigation into the attack on Chen last Friday -- he has refused to accept the offer and has made a new demand. At each step, he has shown he is willing to see the nation's democracy trampled on.
This is what separates a great political leader from a political clown. Disappointment must be overcome by love of country. A country's emerging democracy must not be sacrificed for one man's political vanity.
Today's rally could be a turning point in this country's history. Any attempt to riot will turn the clock back. This would be a huge setback and humiliation to what people have strived for in the past decades.
The people clearly believe in democratic consolidation and they shall prevail. Hopefully the international community will not see this political grandstanding by Lien as a sign of crisis.
The strength of the nation's democracy is shown most clearly through the difficulties it can endure. There is no reason not to have full confidence that democratic values will ultimately prevail -- and that most of the people who live in this country will accept the result peacefully and follow the spirit of reconciliation.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS