Qummergal grimaced as she bared her face to a camera for the first time. But when she saw her portrait, she giggled with delight. "I can't believe it's me," she said. "Look at me. It's wonderful!"
Qummergal was registering to vote in Afghanistan's first elections since the advent of war 25 years ago. "My son told me to come here," she explained. "When the time comes to choose a new king, he will tell me what to do."
Qummergal, whose husband was killed by the Taliban four years ago, was more clued up than most women registering at Khalilullah Khalili high school in Kabul. Several had no idea why they were there. And all said they would vote for whomever their husbands or sons told them to.
The men queuing outside another schoolroom were a little better informed. "This is a happy day for me, I am looking forward to voting for peace," said Ahmed Shah, adding that he would not permit his wife to vote.
But Mohammed Momen, a stern figure with a black turban and matching beard, was perhaps more representative. "I've come to get a registration card and maybe some food," he said.
Midway through Afghanistan's voter registration process, these were typical scenes for Max Campos, a UN worker overseeing proceedings. "People are disappointed when we tell them we're not giving anything away. Some people come here expecting some food," he said. "There's very little understanding of what the process is.
"Things we take for granted, like women's rights and political parties, many Afghans have never heard of."
In the post-Sept. 11 world, Afghanistan's presidential and parliamentary elections are a crucial milestone, and not only for Afghans. They are intended to show the feasibility of democracy in a broken society, vindicating the US policy of toppling unsavory regimes without colonizing the mess they leave behind.
The stakes are high, but the UN's progress is slow. It began registering voters on Dec. 1, anticipating elections in September. From the outset, this was a formidable task. Most Afghans were not even born at the time of the country's last census, making the UN's target of 10.5 million voters a very rough estimate.
Throughout, the UN has struggled for cash, and still needs US$27 million to complete registration. "Money is a major problem," said Reg Austen, the UN's chief electoral officer. "We started at least two months late because we couldn't raise the funds we needed, and we still can't."
Worse, a Taliban resurgence has put most of southern Afghanistan out of bounds to UN staff; a French UN worker was murdered by the group's assassins in November. A subsequent plan to use mosques as registration and polling stations was shelved after the Taliban threatened to kill mullahs cooperating with the plan.
"Even in Kabul, we're effectively under a 24-hour curfew. From an election point of view, it's a complete disaster," said Austen.
"People will say, you're stupid to try holding an election in a country still half at war. But I'm afraid that's the situation we're in."
Registration is far behind schedule, with about 1 million voters officially registered in the seven biggest towns. The real figure could be much lower because many people are thought to have registered more than once.
And, to the UN's despair, the election date has been brought forward. In January President Hamid Karzai announced polls would be held in June. There was just one reason for the change, according to diplomats in Kabul: pressure from the US. With an election of his own due in November and Iraq in flames, US President George W. Bush needs a positive foreign policy to sell to US voters.
"Even the Americans recognize that the elections are being rushed," a European diplomat said. "But that's too bad: Bush wants elections in June."
To accelerate voter registration -- and to avoid sending staff into the violent south -- the UN plans to train 35,000 Afghans as electoral officers. From May 1 these officers will be charged with registering the 8.5 million eligible voters estimated to be living outside Afghanistan's main towns -- in just three weeks. "It's still possible," Austen said. "If each site registers 60 people a day, we'll do it."
But the 35,000 workers and 4,200 registration sites are still to be found. Even then, the 8.5 million Afghans must be persuaded to register. Or rather, half that number -- and their wives. In rural and, especially, traditional southern Afghanistan, women are rarely permitted to leave their homes. Even in urban areas, women represent less than a quarter of the people registered so far.
"It's a matter of selling the process, you've got to tell people that if they won't let their wives vote, men in other parts of the country will, and then they'll miss out," said Masood Karokhail, a civil education officer for Swiss Peace, a non-governmental organization.
Karzai is expected to win the presidential elections with ease, and diplomats believe they can be held on time, though with a limited number of voters. But, with no political parties yet registered, or constituencies defined, parliamentary election cannot, according to Austen.
Karzai would then be left ruling by decree -- a prospect some of Afghanistan's other powerbrokers find troubling.
Two years after the fall of the Taliban, most of Afghanistan is ruled by warlords with little regard for Karzai's government in Kabul. They have little to gain from a unified, democratic and centrally governed Afghanistan.
"If anyone thinks we are ready for elections, he's lying," said General Daoud Khan, the powerful commander of northern Kunduz. "But if we must have elections, those people in the south shouldn't be allowed to vote."
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
On Monday, a group of bipartisan US senators arrived in Taiwan to support the nation’s special defense bill to counter Chinese threats. At the same time, Beijing announced that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had invited Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) to visit China, a move to make the KMT a pawn in its proxy warfare against Taiwan and the US. Since her inauguration as KMT chair last year, Cheng, widely seen as a pro-China figure, has made no secret of her desire to interact with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and meet with Xi, naming it a
A delegation of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials led by Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is to travel to China tomorrow for a six-day visit to Jiangsu, Shanghai and Beijing, which might end with a meeting between Cheng and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The trip was announced by Xinhua news agency on Monday last week, which cited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Director Song Tao (宋濤) as saying that Cheng has repeatedly expressed willingness to visit China, and that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee and Xi have extended an invitation. Although some people have been speculating about a potential Xi-Cheng
No state has ever formally recognized the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) as a legal entity. The reason is not a lack of legitimacy — the CTA is a functioning exile government with democratic elections and institutions — but the iron grip of realpolitik. To recognize the CTA would be to challenge the People’s Republic of China’s territorial claims, a step no government has been willing to take given Beijing’s economic leverage and geopolitical weight. Under international law, recognition of governments-in-exile has precedent — from the Polish government during World War II to Kuwait’s exile government in 1990 — but such recognition