While some people around the world were concerned about whether China would react in a military way to the peace referendum on March 20, most overlooked the fact that Taiwan would also be holding a peaceful presidential election -- and a referendum on the future of Asian democracy.
To look on the bright -- and constructive -- side, if the election and referendum proceed in a smooth and orderly way, without sparking significant cross-strait tensions, Taiwan could be in the vanguard of building a new Asian democracy. This notion of "new Asian democracy," characterized by people's power to achieve a deepening of democracy through institutionalized mechanisms, will have unprecedented effects on major nations in the region.
Asia has become a focus of democracy theorists' attention in recent years because of its democratic consolidation. Both South Korea and Taiwan accomplished the first peaceful transfers of political power in their history. Hong Kong residents, after experimenting with China's formula of "one country, two systems" for some years, took to the streets in protest of Beijing's infringing on their human rights.
The Asian community captured worldwide attention for its potential to internalize democratic principles in people's daily lives.
Good news does not last long. In three global waves of democratization, many countries -- including some in Asia -- have completed transfers of political power but are either still mired in trouble, or old authoritarian conservative political forces have made a comeback because the people could not put up with the pain of reforms.
Cronyism still plays a role in some Southeast Asia democracies, which led to the resignation of presidents in the Philippines and Indonesia. Former South Korean president Kim Dae-jung's term was marred by his involvement with bribery for peace negotiations with the North. Kim's successor, Roh Moo-hyun, has been having a hard time dealing with domestic forces and was impeached by parliament yesterday.
Overall, Asian democracy seemed to have lost its historical momentum at the turn of the new century.
But the political landscape in Asia will be shaped by a new round of elections this year, which will open another gateway for building Asian democracy. Taiwan's election will be followed by congressional elections in Malaysia and South Korea, and presidential elections in the Philippines and Indonesia this summer. Taiwan will have legislative elections before the end of this year. Thailand may have parliamentary elections early next year.
If President Chen Shui-bian (
Since Chen's challenger -- Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Moreover, Chen's referendum will bring about further democratization in Asian countries.
Indonesia and South Korea have both expressed interest in introducing referendums to solve policy and political disputes. Hence, Taiwan's implementation of the referendum mechanism could help establish an example for its Asian allies.
What distinguishes Taiwan from China is this nation's embrace of and adherence to democracy. A "peaceful framework for cross-strait stability and interaction," embedded in the second referendum question, will demonstrate Taiwan's desire to solve cross-strait differences through democratic means.
In this regard, the peace referendum should be valued by the entire Asian community.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS