Anyone who felt hopeful in recent weeks that for once the Legislative Yuan would get its act together by passing some highly important bills before the presidential election -- most notably the political donations bill and the bill to reduce the number of seats in the Legislative Yuan by half -- was utterly disappointed last week.
With the breakdown of negotiations between the legislative caucuses, it isn't good enough for the pan-blue and pan-green caucuses to distract people's attention by focusing on which side is standing in the way of reform.
Originally the caucuses had agreed that on March 12 the legislature would review and pass some long-overdue bills, with the political donations bill at the top of the list. But when the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) caucuses demanded that a bill to reduce the number of seats in the legislature be reviewed that day as well -- a proposal which the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party (PFP) rejected -- negotiations broke down.
Anyone who has been following the presidential campaign knows that passing bills on political donations and on reducing the number of seats in the legislature has become an important issue in the campaign, and that both presidential candidates have given their support to the bills.
With respect to reducing legislative seats, this initiative was a plank in the campaign platform of almost all the parties in the last legislative election. Opinion poll after opinion poll has shown that passing such a bill is supported by an overwhelming majority of the public.
It isn't hard to understand why people support the bill -- just look at the pathetic performance of the Legislative Yuan, where lawmakers resort to physical violence against each other and verbal violence not only against each other but also against government officials at interpellation sessions.
The inability -- or refusal -- of the legislature to pass important bills year after year shows that in addition to being a rude body, it is also an incompetent one.
In response to the Legislative Yuan's inaction on the bill to cut the number of seats in the legislature, former DPP chairman Lin I-hsiung (
Under the circumstances, it is surprising that the KMT and PFP legislative caucuses have refused to include the bill on the reduction of legislative seats among the bills to be reviewed and passed before the presidential election. This refusal reinforces the impression that the KMT-PFP alliance is standing in the way of much-needed reforms -- which cannot be good for Lien's presidential campaign.
No less important is the bill on political donations. The ongoing controversy surrounding former Tuntex Group chairman Chen Yu-hao's (
If the pan-blue camp thinks that passage of the bill would only score points for Chen, it is wrong. Passing the bill would in fact burnish the reform credentials of each candidate.
It is sincerely hoped that in the coming week, the Legislative Yuan will resume negotiations and pass these two much-needed bills.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS