The people of Taiwan showed an astonishing determination and unity on Saturday, when close to 2 million people joined hands to form a human chain that stretched from the northern to the southern end of the country. They said "yes" to Taiwan and "no" to China. To the international community they said, "We are here!"
The human-chain rally was a milestone in the history of this nation's political movements. In the past, a rally of several tens of thousands of people would be enough to stun the Cabinet. In 1997, when Lien Chan (連戰) was concurrently serving as vice president and premier, close to 100,000 people took to the streets to protest deteriorating public safety. The protest led to Lien's resignation as premier. Saturday's rally set a record for the number of people taking to the streets at one time. Its consequences may prove far more impactful.
The size of the rally was a stunning accomplishment, but was still not large enough a figure for the main game, because 2 million votes is not enough to get a presidential candidate elected. The magic number needed for the March 20 election is 6.5 million. Pro-green camp forces still need to work hard to reach this mark in the face of a largely pro-blue camp media.
The human chain far exceeded the 1989 Baltic Chain in terms of numbers. But the Baltic rally was aiming instead for international support for the independence movements of the three Baltic states. Taiwan's rally has also attracted international attention, but the demands made at the rally were abstract and did not provide specific goals and methods to consolidate international support. Even though the rally's numbers far exceeded those of last year's 200,000-strong mobilization calling for a change to the country's official name, the demands presented at that time were far more precise.
Yet the rally may be of critical significance to the nation's future development. It was a democratic experiment pushing for a national political agenda. And it was a hugely successful experiment: The people of Taiwan have already grasped the fact that they can take the initiative in expressing their will directly. This is a concrete result of the deepening of Taiwan's democracy.
However, a successful experiment does not guarantee successful results.
The most important task now is to ensure that a leader who can represent public opinion and staunchly defend Taiwan's democratic path be elected on March 20, as well as maximizing the referendum vote against China's missile threat and for peaceful cross-strait negotiations.
The people of Taiwan are accustomed to representative democracy. Now they have a more direct and more effective way to express their opinion -- referendums. Referendums will be an important catalyst in the transition of the political culture. They will be a shield against China's subtle rhetorical weapon of "one country, two systems." They will also strengthen public oversight of major national policies and give Taiwan an enhanced voice in the international community.
The hand-in-hand rally has made the people of Taiwan understand that democratic power really is in their hands. This precious power already exists in their hearts. May both continue to grow and mature.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS