When Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) was done with his Lunar New Year show, "Visiting The Poor To See How They Are Doing," he dashed off on a foreign tour with France being the most important stop. The reason France is so important is that it is one of the most important members of the EU. Since France also often takes the lead in opposing the US, it has become a natural strategic partner of China's.
Hu brought with him two major demands on his visit to France. First, he wanted France to oppose a referendum, and, second, he wanted France to use its influence in the EU to lift the ban on arms sales to China. On Jan. 26, the same day Hu arrived in France, a meeting between EU foreign ministers in the General Affairs and External Relations Council turned down France's suggestion that the EU embargo on the sale of arms to China be lifted prior to April 1, with some countries saying they needed further proof showing that China's human-rights record has been improved.
Some countries also warned that a lifting of the embargo should not be rushed at a time when the relationship between Beijing and Taiwan was tense due to the March 20 referendum. They did agree, however, to reconsider a lifting of the ban at their spring session, and invited the Permanent Representative Committee and the Political and Security Committee to look into the matter.
When it comes to the issue of the referendum, the French president, Jacques Chirac, couldn't wait to express his support for China's position, and did so on the night of Hu's arrival. At a news conference on Jan. 27, he also attacked Taiwan, using the words "grave mistake" and "provocative" (to describe Taiwan's plans to hold a referendum).
A joint Sino-French declaration also stated France's opposition to "any unilateral initiative whatsoever, including a referendum which aims to change the status quo by increasing tensions in the strait and leading to Taiwan's independence." Compared to the attitude of US President George W. Bush, who issued a simultaneous warning that China must not change the status quo (in the Taiwan Strait), it is obvious that Chirac is firmly on China's side.
French media criticized Chirac, saying that he was granting any and all of Hu's requests. But apart from meeting these two major demands, there are at least two or three other problematic issues. First is the arrests by French police of many Falun Gong members protesting their suppression by China. Without discrimination, police arrested anyone wearing yellow clothes or a yellow scarf. The same thing happened when former Chinese president Jiang Zemin (
Second, the French government gladly accepted that the ethnic Chinese French citizen and winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature, Gao Xingjian (高行健), and his works will be completely excluded from the "Year of China" organized in France to celebrate 40 years of Sino-French diplomatic recognition, despite the fact that Gao's book, Soul Mountain, was written in Chinese.
Third, Hu was allowed to give a speech in the French parliament, a temple of the people. As a result, more than half of lawmakers were absent in protest.
Hu actually said that without democracy, there would be no socialism and socialism would not be modernized. It turned out that China had implemented democracy before France did so, and of course before Taiwan did so.
He also said that when France and Taiwan still were implementing capitalism, China had already realized socialism. Does the fact that this kind of nonsense can be heard in the French parliament add to France's glory, or does it mean that France is in decline?
These actions by Chirac are, in fact, not unexpected. France is indeed the homeland of the declaration of human rights. After the Tiananmen massacre, it was very moving to see former French president Francois Mitterand's government open its arms to accept and support the Chinese democracy movement.
Not long after, however, Chirac came to power and in 1996 he received then-Chinese premier Li Peng (李鵬), "the butcher of Tiananmen," making France the first major Western nation to receive Li.
When Jiang visited France in 1999, Chirac invited him to his home in central France, where his wife danced with the dictator. The aim of sucking up to China in this manner was the hope to receive Chinese orders, and orders for Airbus aircraft in particular.
How much more of the French people's spirit will Chirac have to sacrifice? France indeed has its measure of nationalism, in particular when arguing with the US. But where is this nationalism when France is being so unassuming towards the Chinese dictatorship?
There is nothing of the spirit of Charles de Gaulle, but, instead, we see the shadow of Henri Philippe Petain (head of the collaborationist French Vichy regime during World War II). No wonder there has been a strong public reaction.
The people of Taiwan, however, shouldn't be too concerned with France. They should see that China is behind all this.
Unfortunately, some blue-camp politicians and media people gloat over this disaster and aim their attacks not at China, but at Taiwan itself.
This is what their "Taiwan First" means -- just like China, they give priority to beating up on Taiwan. This is not a matter of ethnicity, it is a matter of national identification.
After looking at the issue from this perspective, can it still be said that holding a referendum is unnecessary?
Paul Lin is a commentator based in New York.
Translated by Perry Svensson
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS